AI Rate Professor

Communication

Noorunnissa Abbasi

ENGLISH82 · COMS1 · COMS40 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
85/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a supportive communication instructor with discussion-heavy classes.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHelpfulEngaging DiscussionsSupportivePresentation Practice
  • Students describe her as helpful and enjoyable.
  • Class discussions and presentations are a major part of the experience.
  • The evidence is positive but limited and old.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

There is no direct grade evidence, but moderate difficulty ratings suggest a manageable class with normal effort.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Students describe the class positively, though presentations and persuasion work add some challenge.

Only in-person reviews discuss the course experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

84/100

Students recommend her because , and creates useful class discussions.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

, so leniency cannot be strongly confirmed.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

65/100

Presentations and discussions are mentioned, but no student describes the workload as heavy.

Format shift

Only in-person comments mention assignments, mainly presentations.

Teaching experience

Good

83/100

Students repeatedly describe her as helpful, excellent, and enjoyable.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The only assessment details mention discussions and presentations rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and describe her as helpful, enjoyable, and strong for discussions and presentations.

Main concern

Presentations may feel nerve-racking for some students.

What students said

“ .”
COMS1
“She was excellent, I loved her!”
COMS40

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or rules.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and class format. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

83/100

“She was excellent, I loved her!”

👍 Student Support

84/100

“ .”

🗣️ Class Experience

72/100

“ and presentations to.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Good teacher overall
  • She was excellent, I loved her!

Theme 2

🗣️ About Class Activities

  • and presentations to.
  • Nerve wrecking but good specially the persuasion and arguments one.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only , though their tone is consistent.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COMS11 review
COMS401 review
ENGLISH821 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values