AI Rate Professor

Natural Sciences

Shereese Alexander

MICR200 · MICROBIOLOGY · MICRO200 · CERRITOS2014 · BIOLOGY7 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

if , and a high time commitment.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough TestsQuiz HeavyExtra CreditVague ExplanationsMixed Lectures
  • Students consistently describe the course as tough and test-heavy.
  • Positive reviews say lectures are direct and helps grades.
  • Negative , and belittling tone.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

A high grade is possible with and study guides, but students , and major time demands.

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The subject is difficult and several students say explanations, study guides, and .

Only in-person reviews describe course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Some students praise her direct lectures, but many warn that tests and communication problems make the class risky.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

helps, but hard and as grade-damaging.

Format shift

and tests.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students report , and a large time commitment.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

and severe complaints about vague explanations and poor student interaction.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Grades , and repeated exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews show a demanding science class with frequent quizzes and hard tests, balanced by some praise for direct lectures and .

Main concern

as vague, difficult, and capable of damaging grades.

What students said

“You must dedicate a lot of time to this class.”
20753
“ .”
MICROBIOLOGY
“ blankshort answer.”
MICRO200

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The because students describe , and demanding written answers.

Frequent QuizzesHard Lecture TestsFill-In-The-Blank QuestionsShort Answer Questions

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe , and fill-in-the-blank or short-answer formats.

Frequent QuizzesHard Lecture TestsFill-In-The-Blank QuestionsShort Answer Questions
“ blankshort answer.”
MICRO200
“Quizzes tests and more tests and quizzes”
MICROBIOLOGY
“ ”
20753

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You must dedicate a lot of time to this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“shes great! its a tough subject but her lectures are straight forward and to the point.”

🧪

28/100

“Quizzes tests and more tests and quizzes and she takes up to 3 .”

📈 Effort For A

38/100

“You must dedicate a lot of time to this class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • shes great! its a tough subject but her lectures are straight forward and to the point.
  • She doesn't explane subjects.
  • Vague, vague, vague!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , but then again she gives a lot of .
  • .
  • A+ No BS, great lecture.

Theme 3

🧪

  • Quizzes tests and more tests and quizzes
  • blankshort answer.
  • she does give study guides!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

64/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews from a short time span give detailed but highly mixed evidence.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MICROBIOLOGY2 reviews
207531 review
BIOLOGY71 review
CERRITOS20141 review
MICR2001 review
Show 1 more courses
MICRO2001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1