AI Rate Professor

English

Claudette Parks

ENGLISH82 · ENGL826065 · ENG826071 · ENG82 · ENG6125 · ENG84 · ENGL84 · ENG6129 · ENG6107 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you can teach yourself and handle a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProNice but ineffectiveHard exit examsExtra credit availableDisorganized teachingAttendance matters
  • Students often describe her as kind, but many say her teaching is weak or disorganized.
  • The class work can feel easy, but as hard and unforgiving.
  • helps, but it does not fully offset the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Routine work and can help, but the and preparation.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Daily class work is often called easy, but the and weak preparation make the overall course feel harder than the basics suggest.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Students say showing up every day matters, and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Students appreciate her personality, but repeated concerns about teaching quality and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

exists, but students repeatedly describe the as unforgiving.

Format shift

and exams.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Most routine work is textbook, vocabulary, or online practice, but the .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Many students say she is nice, but several describe her teaching as .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

The course uses textbook , and a high-stakes final exit exam.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

routine work but weak teaching and high exit exam risk.

Main concern

Students may not feel prepared for the .

What students said

“The class may be easy until you take the .”
ENG84
“her teaching skills are and expects students to do everything for themselves”
ENG6125
“just pay attention in class and do the work and be there everyday and you should be fine.”
ENG826071

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews repeatedly describe the as hard and poorly aligned with class preparation.

Hard Exit ExamFinal Exit ExamExtra Credit Available

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

exam, but do not clearly prove book, webcam, or proctoring rules.

Hard Exit ExamFinal Exit Exam
“The class may be easy until you take the .”
ENG84
“She is no mercy .”
ENG6107

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is a , but that's where the problem lies.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“she is not a great teacher in fact I realize she is lazy most of the time.”

⚠️

25/100

“The class may be easy until you take the .”

📌

20/100

“be there everyday and you should be fine.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her teaching skills are

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Her class is super easy.
  • She does give an e.c. opportunity which is simple.
  • There is a catch22 on her, she

Theme 3

❤️ About Personality

  • Ms.Parks is a nice teacher.Calm & collected.
  • She can be sassy sometimes.
  • and kind. Dont be a fool.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

65/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven older reviews show consistent themes , and , but the data is dated.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG61072 reviews
ENG842 reviews
ENG61251 review
ENG61291 review
ENG821 review
Show 4 more courses
ENG8260711 review
ENGL8260651 review
ENGL841 review
ENGLISH821 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1