AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Kim Baily

N150A · NRSGALL · PHARMN150 · N48 · NSG48 · NURS150 · PHARMN152 · NURS1538917 · NUR150 · NURS8879 · N152 · NURIS150 · NURS8882 · FUNDAN150 · NURS153 · NURSE150 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
63/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take Kim Baily if you want a demanding nursing instructor with strong lectures and can handle a strict, sometimes intimidating style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerClear LecturerCritical Thinking FocusDemanding StandardsUnapproachable at TimesPolarizing Clinical Experience
  • Strong positive , and ability to build critical thinking.
  • Negative reviews describe her as intimidating, unapproachable, unsupportive, or belittling, especially outside lecture.
  • The course is not an easy A, but students who study notes, follow rules, and work hard often see the structure as fair.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Grades appear achievable with , and rule-following, but nursing rigor and critical thinking demands prevent this from being easy.

All grade and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Nursing content is inherently challenging, and she pushes critical thinking, physiology, exams, and clinical performance .

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Comments emphasize being there, following rules, listening carefully, and meeting expectations.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Students , while others strongly dislike her approachability and support style.

Recommendation and is highly polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Students describe clear expectations and straightforward tests, but also hard standards and a need to study carefully.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The work seems manageable for prepared nursing students, but , and rules require steady effort.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload and study expectations.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Her lecture quality is often praised as , and engaging, but approachability and support are major complaints.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

Reviews mention midterms, a , and lecture-exam alignment.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide assessment evidence; there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

many praise her lecture clarity and professionalism, while others warn that she can be unapproachable and harsh.

Main concern

The main concern is whether her demanding and .

What students said

“ and she tells you exactly what she expects.”
NURS1538917
“Good lecture teacher, but is utterly unapproachable if you have questions so you better hope you got it the first time around.”
NURS8879
“need to work hard, listen carefully, take notes, follow the rules, be there ... You'll reap the rewards.”
N152

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as lecture-aligned and sometimes straightforward, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

MidtermCumulative FinalLecture-Aligned ExamsDrug Book Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

correlation, and Drug Book use, but do not clearly prove proctoring or book rules beyond that specific note.

MidtermCumulative FinalLecture-Textbook-Exam CorrelationDrug Book Mentioned
“1 midterm, 1 paper, cumulative final.”
PHARMN150
“ .”
N152
“You will have the Drug Book for the last 1/2hr of the exam.”
PHARMN152

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Good lecture teacher, but is utterly unapproachable if you have questions so you better hope you got it the first time around.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and approachability. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“Her lectures are engaging despite the long class time, you will barely notice that time has flown by already.”

🧠 Learning Style

45/100

“She makes sure you learn by using your own critical thinking!”

👍 Recommendation Level

58/100

“Wow, I'm surprised by all these negative reviews about Dr. Baily. I thought she was very fair and helpful.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Lecture Quality

  • Dr. Baily is an amazing lecturer.
  • and she tells you exactly what she expects.
  • Great lecture teacher. Knows her stuff.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Approachability

  • Not a warm person; difficult to approach.
  • This teacher .
  • terrible. thinks she is so clever with her english accent. knows alot tho highly unapproachable sink or swim with her

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty and Exams

  • need to work hard, listen carefully, take notes, follow the rules, be there ... You'll reap the rewards.
  • .
  • and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 19 in-person reviews with detailed but polarized evidence over several years, giving strong insight into both strengths and risks.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

N1522 reviews
N482 reviews
NUR1502 reviews
FUNDAN1501 review
N150A1 review
Show 11 more courses
NRSGALL1 review
NSG481 review
NURIS1501 review
NURS1501 review
NURS1531 review
NURS15389171 review
NURS88791 review
NURS88821 review
NURSE1501 review
PHARMN1501 review
PHARMN1521 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values