AI Rate Professor

Electronics Technology

Carlos Garcia

ECHT1467488 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Consider him only if you are comfortable with strict structure and can track due dates independently.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrict rulesFast gradingMixed helpfulnessPoor communicationLow evidence
  • Only two reviews exist, and they sharply disagree on his fairness and helpfulness.
  • and syllabus consistency, while another describes poor communication and low support.
  • The main risk is personality fit and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

The course does not sound especially hard, but strict rules and .

All evidence comes from two in-person reviews, with no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Reviews do not describe the electronics content as conceptually hard, but instruction quality may affect the experience.

Only in-person reviews exist, and neither gives much content difficulty detail.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove an .

The in-person , and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

The mixed but because one review reports poor helpfulness and unpredictable due dates.

All and is too limited for high confidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

One student says work was graded quickly and by the syllabus, while another criticizes rule communication.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The reviews mention submitted work and due dates but do not describe the workload as heavy or light.

Format shift

Workload and is sparse.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

One review calls him adequate, but another describes him as lazy, unhelpful, and .

Format shift

Only two in-person reviews exist, and they conflict.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The and due dates rather than exams.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but and lazy, unhelpful communication.

Main concern

A student says and questions may not be handled helpfully.

What students said

“All the work turned in was graded and posted, if not the same night within a day.”
ECHT1467488
“doesn't always make you aware of when things are due because he decides on a whim.”
ECHT1467488

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book policy, or final structure.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very lazy teacher, doesn't always make you aware of when things are due because he decides on a whim.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in structure, communication, and helpfulness. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Not the greatest teacher in the world, but not the .”

⚖️ Structure And Rules

50/100

“He stuck by the rules and the syllabus, strict person, military or not.”

⚠️ Communication Risk

38/100

“doesn't always make you aware of when things are due because he decides on a whim.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He answered all questions asked in class just fine.
  • not helpful when you ask him

Theme 2

⚖️ About Rules And Grading

  • All the work turned in was graded and posted, if not the same night within a day.
  • He stuck by the rules and the syllabus, strict person, military or not.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, and they conflict on the core experience.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ECHT14674882 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1