AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Loan Le

MATH73 · MATH170 · MATH230214 · MATH80 · MATH23 · MATH0486 · MATH70 · MATH60 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

unless you can learn math independently and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard To UnderstandSelf Teaching RequiredHeavy HomeworkUnclear ExplanationsUnfair Grading
  • Most students criticize her teaching clarity and say they had to teach themselves.
  • Some students say the if they already know the math.
  • All evidence is from in-person reviews, with no online review data.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

An A is possible for prepared or self-taught students, but several reviews say it requires hard work and outside learning.

All grade-effort evidence is from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Some math material and tests are described as easy, but .

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty, and they separate easy material from poor instruction.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, but the overall policy is not clearly proven.

and is weak.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

because they found the and the class unsupported.

All because there are zero online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Some tests may be manageable, but students complain , and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students report , and lots of work that often counts for .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Most reviews say she is hard , and leaves students teaching themselves.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and a final.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

accent, weak class support, and heavy homework.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say they could not understand the lectures and had to teach themselves.

What students said

“take this class if you have no problem teaching yourself by yourself”
MATH80
“Easy class material, horrible teacher and class atmosphere.”
MATH70
“ .”
MATH73

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear manageable for students who know the material, but .

Tests With ReviewsQuizzes And MidtermsFinal Reuses Problems

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but do not clearly prove proctoring or book policy.

Tests With ReviewsQuizzes And MidtermsFinal Reuses Problems
“ test days)”
MATH70
“Quizes and ”
MATH0486

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you're okay with teaching yourself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 in-person reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“There is no help or assistance in the class and she CANNOT teach”

👍 Recommendation Level

22/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“ and each homework packet is about 30 pages and only worth 10 points”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very hard to understand her and she has little control over her class...
  • .
  • expect to teach yourself everything.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy to get a C in her class, but if you try a lil easy to get an A
  • however, i got an A+. i worked hard for it though.
  • I got an "A" in the class cause i already know Geometry, otherwise i'll probably get a B.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload And Tests

  • Big packet of .
  • .
  • test days)

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The 16 reviews are consistent and specific about the same teaching problems, though they are old and entirely in person.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 510

Course coverage

MATH233 reviews
MATH703 reviews
MATH803 reviews
MATH732 reviews
02141 review
Show 4 more courses
MATH04861 review
MATH1701 review
MATH2302141 review
MATH601 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values