AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Donna McGovern

BUS3 · BUSIN1A · BUS25 · BUS4 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want an experienced accounting instructor and can , and steady work.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerAccounting ExpertFast PaceTricky ExamsHelpful When AskedHeavy Workload
  • She is highly knowledgeable in accounting and QuickBooks.
  • Students report fast pacing, tricky tests, and .
  • Lectures can feel boring or low value, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

Getting an A appears possible, but , and enough workload that grades require real effort.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

The material can feel harder than expected because accounting concepts, QuickBooks pace, and .

, and they consistently point to challenging pacing and accounting concepts.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as mandatory, but missing lecture can quickly put students behind.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

Students respect her expertise and helpfulness, but recommendations are limited , and test issues.

Only in-person reviews exist, so the recommendation score reflects classroom experiences only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Students report , and one serious test-handling complaint.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

, and a lot of work in cost accounting.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

She is knowledgeable and helpful, but lectures are often described as boring and sometimes not very useful.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and course tasks, with exams creating the most stress.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe an expert teacher whose , and work-intensive.

Main concern

Students struggle with , and boring lectures.

What students said

“The class moves very quickly for a beginner.”
BUS3
“There is a lot of work, but if you need to .”
BUS4
“ and tricky.”
BUS3

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exam style appears strict because students mention , and .

Two Midterms And FinalTricky Exam QuestionsTough Exam GradingPop Quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

tricky exams, and occasional pop quizzes.

Two Midterms And FinalTricky Exam QuestionsPop Quizzes
“2 midterms and a final.”
BUS3
“ .”
BUS3
“You get 4 tests, weekly hw, and .”
BUSIN1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Extremely qualified and knowledgeable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“ and thoroughly.”

⚖️

30/100

“ .”

📚 Course Challenge

36/100

“The class moves very quickly for a beginner.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Extremely qualified and knowledgeable.
  • Lectures follow the website's powerpoint (boring).
  • Any question you have, she has the answer.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • and tricky.
  • There is a lot of work, but if you need to .
  • Definitely a tough class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews across several years give useful detail, but the data is old and has limited grade outcomes.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BUS33 reviews
BUS251 review
BUS41 review
BUSIN1A1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1