AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lewis R.

MATH80 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid unless you are prepared to learn independently in a very hard class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProVery HardPoor Teaching StyleLow Support
  • The only review gives the lowest quality rating and highest difficulty rating.
  • The comment says the class is extremely hard.
  • The review directly criticizes the lack of teaching style.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because the only review repeatedly calls the class hard.

All .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

The course is described as extremely hard with .

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review does .

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

The only student review is strongly negative and .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

, but the highest difficulty rating suggests little grade comfort.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Overwhelming

20/100

The repeated hard rating suggests the workload or cognitive burden feels overwhelming.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

The only review says there is no teaching style and gives the lowest quality score.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not mention exams, homework, quizzes, or .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single in-person review is strongly negative and describes the class as hard with .

Main concern

The main concern is extreme difficulty with poor instruction.

What students said

“Hard hard hard no teaching style”
MATH80

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy or format.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Hard hard hard no teaching style”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“Hard hard hard no teaching style”

📈 Course Difficulty

15/100

“Hard hard hard no teaching style”

👍 Recommendation Level

10/100

“Hard hard hard no teaching style”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Hard hard hard no teaching style

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Hard hard hard no teaching style

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one old, very brief review.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH801 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values