AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Laureano Ribas

MATH70 · MATHMATH · MATH150 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

unless you are already strong in math and can keep up with little support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProVery difficultFast pacedCold demeanorHeavy worksheetsPoor support
  • Students describe the class as difficult and .
  • Comments criticize the instructor for moving quickly and not checking whether students understand.
  • The small review count lowers certainty, but the tone is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

The comments suggest high effort and low support, with no evidence of .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

Students describe the math course as difficult, fast-paced, and unfriendly to weaker math students.

, and they consistently describe the course as hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

There is no online evidence, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students warn against taking the class because the instructor is difficult, fast, and unsupportive.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

There is , but the severe difficulty and warnings suggest a low reward path.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

One review specifically mentions a lot of worksheets, and the overall tone suggests demanding work.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students describe the instructor as cold, fast, and poor at making sure students understand.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The only concrete assessment-related evidence mentions many worksheets, while .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

fast pacing, many worksheets, and limited patience for questions.

Main concern

Students say the instructor moves on too quickly and can make students feel unsupported.

What students said

“ ”
MATH150
“she moves on quick so if you are not good in !”
MATHMATH
“doesnt follow up to see if the student gets it.”
MATH70

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or test format.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she moves on quick so if you are not good in !”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, and difficulty. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“doesnt follow up to see if the student gets it.”

📉 Recommendation Risk

12/100

“ ”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“she gives you a lot of worksheets and makes you feel stupid when asking questions.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she moves on quick so if you are not good in !
  • No sense of humor might aswell bea robot teaching
  • doesnt follow up to see if the student gets it.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she gives you a lot of worksheets and makes you feel stupid when asking questions.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 , so the but not highly robust.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1501 review
MATH701 review
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values