AI Rate Professor

Law

Allan Fork

LAW4 · LAW5 · LAW19 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

Take Allan Fork if you want a and helpful support.

Best fit · Easy A HunterVery easy classLenient deadlinesHelpful teacherEasy A potential
  • Students consistently describe the class as very easy.
  • Grading and deadlines .
  • The limited reviews are old but strongly positive overall.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

95/100

Students directly call it an Easy A, and and poor preparation still led to a decent grade.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

93/100

Students repeatedly describe the course as very easy while still saying they learned.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they consistently describe easy course content.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews , though late assignment acceptance suggests some flexibility.

The in-person reviews mention deadline flexibility but , and there is no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students are highly positive overall and explicitly say they would take him again or found the class great.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

92/100

because students mention an Easy A and decent grades despite weak preparation.

Format shift

This .

Workload

Featherlight

90/100

The workload seems very light because students call the class very easy and mention late assignment acceptance.

Format shift

Only in-person comments describe workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students describe him as helpful, respectful, and effective, though one review is more about personality than teaching.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

Reviews mention assignments and three tests, so assessment .

Format shift

and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

lenient deadlines and strong grade potential.

Main concern

Evidence is old and based on only four reviews.

What students said

“Very easy, great class”
LAW4
“ ”
LAW19
“Easy A! and you'll learn as well.”
LAW19

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention three tests and a study guide, but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or closed-book rules.

Three TestsStudy Guide Provided

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention three tests with a guide to follow, but .

Three TestsStudy Guide Provided
“3tests and give you the guide to follow”
LAW19

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy A! and you'll learn as well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“he is there to help you out and ”

📈 Easy A Potential

95/100

“Easy A! and you'll learn as well.”

👍 Student Recommendation

92/100

“ because he's real cute”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he is there to help you out
  • He deserves respect to return the respect.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Very easy, great class
  • I got a decent grade for never being prepared.
  • Easy A! and you'll learn as well.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is limited by only four old reviews, but the comments are consistent about ease and support.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

LAW192 reviews
LAW41 review
LAW51 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values