AI Rate Professor

English

Latosha Guy

ENG101 · ENG1 · ENGL1C · ENG1C · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you can handle disorganization and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProAvoid warningsDisorganizedLate to classLast-minute homeworkMixed difficulty
  • Most reviews are strongly negative and directly .
  • One detailed review reports lateness, syllabus inconsistency, and inefficient communication.
  • Evidence is limited, but the tone is much more negative than positive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

The reviews do not show an easy A path, and negative comments suggest the experience may be frustrating despite one low difficulty rating.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The course content itself is not clearly described as hard, but disorganization and last-minute work raise the practical difficulty.

Only in-person reviews describe the course experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews , though one says the instructor was often late.

Only in-person comments exist, and they do not prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students give direct avoid warnings, with only one short positive comment.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

There is too little grading detail, but the overall difficulty ratings and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews are available, with .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

, but and poor course organization.

Format shift

The workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

The most detailed review reports lateness, poor communication, and not following the syllabus.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

The only concrete assessment-related evidence mentions .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assignments, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, emphasizing disorganization, lateness, and .

Main concern

Course management appears unreliable based on the most detailed review.

What students said

“Usually 15 minutes late to Class”
ENG1C
“ !”
ENG1
“ !!!”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in organization, recommendation, and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Recommendation Risk

25/100

“ !!!”

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Sometimes did no follow her own syllabus or agenda”

📌 Course Management

35/100

“Usually 15 minutes late to Class”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Usually 15 minutes late to Class
  • Sometimes did no follow her own syllabus or agenda
  • used an inefficient email system to contact students and

Theme 2

👍 About Recommendations

  • great class
  • !
  • !!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, and most are very short, though the negative tone is consistent.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG11 review
ENG1011 review
ENG1C1 review
ENGL1C1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values