AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Sharon Van Enoo

SPELLING · LEARN123 · AS25B · AS40AB · AB30 · AS4068 · AS4053 · TESTT0925 · TTSSECT · ACADEMICSTRAT · ACADSTRA · ACST33AB · HUMANITIES · STUDYSKILLS · TESST0000 · ASTHINKSKILLS · ACSRAT · AS33 · AS4026 · ACADS30AB · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you want an easy skills class and can tolerate a strict, sometimes polarizing teaching style.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy ABoring classStrict about behaviorMixed teaching qualityHelpful for some students
  • Many students say the class is easy, but teaching quality and usefulness are sharply divided.
  • Several reviews describe her as rude, strict, or easily , and following directions.
  • Positive reviews say her study and test strategies can be useful, especially for students who follow her methods.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Many students call the class an easy A, though strict behavior expectations and worksheets can still affect the experience.

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

The material is generally basic skills, worksheets, and study strategies that most students describe as easy.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Students explicitly say , and gets upset about tardiness or absences.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendations are split because the class is easy and sometimes useful, but many students criticize her attitude, clarity, and value.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

The class is often described as easy, but some reviews mention strict marking, style demands, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

76/100

Work appears mostly worksheets and basic class activities, though some students complain there are too many worksheets.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

and fun to boring, rude, unclear, and ineffective.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Reviews mention worksheets, mini quizzes, test-taking practice, and class methods rather than a .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

but polarizing class, with some students benefiting from her strategies and others finding her rude, boring, or unclear.

Main concern

The main risk is her strict, sarcastic, or impatient classroom manner.

What students said

“Shes really rude and sarcastic, often arguing with students, But for the most part shes really easy, boring and rude.”
AS4053
“THE STUFF , AND IT IS EASY TO UNDERSTAND AND FOLLOW.”
ACADS30AB
“Very easy class but did not help me at all.”
TTSSECT

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention mini quizzes and test-taking strategy work, but do .

Mini QuizzesTest-Taking PracticeExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and test-taking strategies, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, closed-book rules, proctoring, midterms, or finals.

Mini QuizzesTest-Taking PracticeFormal exam policy not clearly proven
“All of .”
TESST0000
“I benefited MAJORLY in this class & applied and false, etc.”
TESTT0925

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very easy class but did not help me at all. Waste of my time and money.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in ease, teaching usefulness, and classroom strictness. Credibility rating: High.

📈 Easy A Pattern

86/100

“ so boring, and shes so boring, but shes an easy A.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“I benefited MAJORLY in this class & applied and false, etc.”

⚠️ Classroom Friction

18/100

“she does get mad easily and hates it when you are tardy or absent.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • An easy A.
  • Very easy class but did not help me at all.
  • and

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • goOD AND HELPFUL TEACHER.
  • she doesnt know how to teach. needs to go back and learn
  • she was good. her lectures were interesting

Theme 3

⚠️ About Strictness & Personality

  • She is the rudest person on the face of the planet.
  • and punctuality.
  • Very strict with the style.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-one in-person reviews across many years provide enough detail to show a consistent easy-class pattern with strongly mixed reactions to her style.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 53
3 out of 55
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

AS25B2 reviews
AB301 review
ACADEMICSTRAT1 review
ACADS30AB1 review
ACADSTRA1 review
Show 15 more courses
ACSRAT1 review
ACST33AB1 review
AS331 review
AS40261 review
AS40531 review
AS40681 review
AS40AB1 review
ASTHINKSKILLS1 review
HUMANITIES1 review
LEARN1231 review
SPELLING1 review
STUDYSKILLS1 review
TESST00001 review
TESTT09251 review
TTSSECT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values