AI Rate Professor

English

Yong Yoon

ESL52B · ENG1A · ENGLI1A · ENG6306 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you want a lively English class with serious academic value and can tolerate a confident teaching style.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHigh Quality EducationFun PersonalityInteractive ClassUniversity PreparationOccasionally Cocky
  • Most students praise him as a strong, fun, and serious English instructor.
  • The class is not framed as a free A, but students find it manageable and worthwhile.
  • A small minority criticize his personality as cocky or contradictory.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

The class sounds manageable but focused on serious college-level .

All grade-effort evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Students describe the class as easygoing and fun, but also serious and university-level.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

No online or .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students recommend him for engaging teaching, high educational quality, and strong transfer preparation.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

There is , but low difficulty ratings suggest fair and manageable expectations.

Format shift

online grade evidence.

Workload

Moderate

64/100

Workload is not described as heavy, but comments emphasize serious learning rather than an effortless course.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Most students describe him as excellent, fun, interactive, dynamic, and effective at teaching English.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether assignments or exams dominate assessment.

Format shift

Neither online nor in-person reviews clearly prove the assessment mix.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, quality education, transfer preparation, and a dynamic teaching style.

Main concern

Some students find him cocky, contradictory, or occasionally off-putting.

What students said

“The quality of education in this class is high.”
ENG1A
“ .”
ENG6306
“He can be really cocky and contradicting to his statements.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or testing policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you want to tranfer to univercity.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, recommendation, personality, and academic value. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“Professor Yoon is an excellent professor.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“ .”

⚠️ Personality Fit

62/100

“He can be really cocky and contradicting to his statements.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His class is interactive and dynamic.
  • Fun, but "to-the-point."
  • There's lots of fun while learning.

Theme 2

📚 About Academic Value

  • The quality of education in this class is high.
  • If you are serious about your college education, this is the class to take.
  • Professor Yoon's class is about quality education.

Theme 3

😬 About Personality

  • He can be really cocky and contradicting to his statements.
  • Cocky & full of himself, yet humble.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews are mostly consistent and detailed enough for teaching quality, though they are old and and exams.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG63066 reviews
ENG1A5 reviews
ENGLI1A1 review
ESL52B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values