AI Rate Professor

Art

Tina Riggs

ART1A · ART · ARTART · ART5021 · ART101 · ART1 · ART8756 · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take her only if you can , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerBoring lecturesHard testsStrict attendanceHeavy readingHelpful if engaged
  • Most reviews describe lectures as boring and test-heavy.
  • Students repeatedly say the tests are harder than expected for an art class.
  • A smaller group , and manageable if you read and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A appears possible only with , and test preparation, and many students still struggled after studying.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Students often say introductory art felt unexpectedly hard because and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and missing class can badly hurt performance.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Most negative reviews warn against taking her because lectures are boring and exams are difficult, despite some older positive comments.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Several students , and difficulty passing despite studying.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload , and detailed exam preparation rather than regular homework.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

She is sometimes described as knowledgeable and patient, but the , and unhelpful lectures.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

- and quiz-based, with multiple comments saying tests dominate the course.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews show a strict, lecture-heavy class with and mixed teaching value.

Main concern

Tests and and study guides prepare students for.

What students said

“ .”
ART1
“Her study guides do not help!”
ART5021
“ .”
ART1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and quizzes, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Hard TestsFrequent QuizzesStudy Guides Often UnhelpfulReading-Heavy Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring details.

Hard TestsFrequent QuizzesStudy Guides Often Unhelpful
“60% of your and they're extremely hard.”
ART1
“ .”
ART1A
“Her study guides do not help!”
ART5021

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor makes Art 1 harder than it ever should be. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Her lectures are boring.No enthusiasm.”

📈 Grade Cost

32/100

“As are not easy to get, but not impossible and and and problems”

🧪

28/100

“60% of your and they're extremely hard.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her lectures are boring, because she readds directly from the book.
  • . helpful and straight forward.
  • tries hard to make class interesting but sometimes fails at it.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • She's a .
  • Easy A though, just do the handouts!!

Theme 3

📚

  • .
  • buy the book, u need it!
  • Do the reading. You'll be fine.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 35 reviews over many years with consistent themes , and .

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 52
3 out of 56
2 out of 510
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ART124 reviews
ART1A4 reviews
ART50213 reviews
ART1 review
ART1011 review
Show 2 more courses
ART87561 review
ARTART1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values