AI Rate Professor

Economics

Glenn Thomas

ECON1 · ECONS1AND2 · ECON2 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

if you can attend, listen closely, and rely on lecture notes for straightforward exams.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear lecturesLecture-based examsLow difficultyHelpful answersNo textbook needed
  • , so strong notes are the main path to success.
  • Students describe him as , and academically effective.
  • The main weakness is a soft speaking style that can make class feel boring or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Getting an A appears very manageable because and come straight from lecture notes.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Students describe the economics content as , and understandable when they listen and .

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person ECON reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

65/100

, but listening in lecture is important because .

Only in-person comments discuss attendance-related learning value.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students generally recommend him because , and makes economics understandable.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

The exams are described as easy and lecture-based, suggesting forgiving grading when students follow class material.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

88/100

Workload appears light because students mainly need good notes and may not need the textbook.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

86/100

He is viewed as , and effective, though one student found his quiet speaking style boring.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Comments focus mainly on exams that come directly from lectures, with little mention of assignments.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and helpful economics professor whose exams are lecture-based and easy if .

Main concern

His soft speaking style can make lectures boring or hard to hear.

What students said

“ .”
ECON1
“great teacher, and .”
ECON2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as lecture-based and not hard, making the exam style student-friendly.

Lecture-Based ExamsNo Textbook NeededLow Exam Difficulty

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

material and are not hard if students listen.

Lecture-Based ExamsLow Exam Difficulty
“ .”
ECON1
“ listen clear(if you can)”
ECON1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“great teacher, and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“great teacher, and .”

📝

82/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Value

88/100

“ and you won't need to buy the book.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • great teacher, and .
  • him, he will answer it.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • listen clear(if you can)

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews are consistent but old, and one review contains no substantive comment.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ECON12 reviews
ECON21 review
ECONS1AND21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values