G Zuidervaart

ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENG000 · 1C · ENG15B · ENGLI1 · ENGLISH1A · ENG6422 · ENGLISHA · ENGLISH1B · ENG15 · ENGLI1A · ENG1C · ENG6222 · A · ENG25A · 47 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 86/100
RMP rating: 4.7/5
Take again: —
Difficulty: 3.0

The decision

Take her if you want to become a better writer and are willing to read, participate, and revise.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerStrong writing coachChallenging but worthwhileHelpful feedbackParticipation expectedNot an easy A

Most students praise her as clear, helpful, engaging, and effective at improving writing.
The class rewards effort through reading, essays, discussion, revisions, and extra credit.
Students looking for an easy A or low participation may find her strict and demanding.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Good grades are possible with consistent reading, essays, participation, and revisions, but students repeatedly say it is not an easy A.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The course content is concept-heavy and writing-focused, with quizzes, essays, discussion, and critical thinking demands.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Reviews emphasize attending on time, participating every session, and losing points for tardiness.

Attendance .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students recommend her because she teaches clearly, gives useful feedback, and helps writing improve despite the challenge.

Recommendation evidence is entirely from in-person classes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

She grades by clear standards and offers revision or extra credit, but several students describe strict expectations.

Format shift

All grading evidence is from in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload commonly includes essays, reading quizzes, reading assignments, participation, and drafts.

Format shift

Only in-person workload evidence is available.

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Most students say she is clear, helpful, engaging, caring, and effective at improving writing.

Format shift

Teaching feedback is entirely from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment is driven mostly by essays, reading, quizzes, drafts, participation, and revisions rather than exams.

Format shift

All assessment evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews strongly favor her teaching and feedback, while repeatedly warning that the class requires real effort.

Main concern

Students who want an easy A may struggle with the workload, quizzes, participation, and grading standards.

What students said

“if you wanna learn take her class!”
ENG1A

“Hard teacher lots of quizes.”
ENG1A

“Challenging, but .”
ENG1C

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews suggest low exam risk because students mainly mention essays, reading quizzes, homework, and no tests rather than traditional exams.

No Tests MentionedReading QuizzesEssaysMidterm Rundown Mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

76/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention quizzes, essays, and , but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, webcam, or final exam policy.

No Tests MentionedReading QuizzesEssaysMidterm Rundown Mentioned

“No tests, just homework (reading mostly), quizzes, and about five essays.”
ENG1A

“about 5 essays and 10 reading quizzes through the semester.”
ENG1A

“She helps you alot on essays and even gives you the you the .”
ENG1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“Good for students who don't mind a challenge and want to learn, but not an Easy A.”
Voice snapshots generated from 47 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, writing improvement, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“She really helps you to understand the material. !!!”

📈 Effort for Grades

58/100

“Good for students who don't mind a challenge and want to learn, but not an Easy A.”

📝 Writing Growth

91/100

“My writing has improved tremendously.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

She's very good at explaining concepts, encouraging you and meeting after class.
Her lectures are interesting and very fun to listen to.
She tells you exactly what she wants and is very thorough in explaining how.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload and Grades

Hard teacher lots of quizes.
As long as you do the work and try, you should do well in her class.
make sure you attend class ON TIME. you get points off for tardiness and late assignments.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support and Growth

She cares about everyone in her class and wants them to succeed.
my writing has actually improved.
She makes sure you learn--she helps you as much as she can.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-seven detailed in-person reviews over several years are highly consistent about strong teaching and meaningful workload.

Inside 47 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 540

4 out of 53

3 out of 51

2 out of 52

1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1A15 reviews

ENG1C6 reviews

ENGLISH1A4 reviews

ENGLISHA4 reviews

ENG25A3 reviews

Show 11 more courses

1C2 reviews

ENG15B2 reviews

ENG64222 reviews

ENGLI1A2 reviews

A1 review

ENG0001 review

ENG151 review

ENG62221 review

ENGL1A1 review

ENGLI11 review

ENGLISH1B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

A 1 · A- 1

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values