AI Rate Professor

History

Lawrence Guillow

HIS101A · HIST1B · HISTORY · HIST1 · HISTO0410 · HST1B · HIST101 · HIST4 · HIST1877 · HIST · HIST2332 · HISTORY4 · HISTORY1A · WORLDHISTORY · HIST1A · HISTHIST · ONLINEHIST1B · HISORY3 · HISTB · HIST102 · HISTO1B · HIST01 · HISTORY3 · HISTORY1B · 55 lifetime ratings

AI rating
57/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you are comfortable studying independently for detailed essay exams and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProEssay-heavy examsMixed grading fairnessOptional attendanceBoring for someInteresting lecturer
  • Students split sharply between calling him an interesting, easy lecturer and warning about unfair or .
  • The class often has , and essay midterm or final exams.
  • Getting an A depends heavily on memorizing specific details and writing the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

63/100

Some students call it an easy A with advance essay questions, but many warn that and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, even when a few comments mention online courses in the text.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The content is usually manageable, but and heavy memorization make it more than a simple history class.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

72/100

, but students recommend going because , and exam preparation depend on class information.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

He works well for students who like lectures and essay preparation, but and boring delivery make him risky.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

as detail-heavy, harsh, vague, or unfair despite some students finding the class easy.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

Homework is usually minimal, but the , and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

He is often called knowledgeable and interesting, but many students find him boring, unhelpful, or too dependent on PowerPoint.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

and finals, with smaller quizzes and a museum paper in many reviews.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

many praise easy structure and interesting lectures, while many criticize boring delivery, vague expectations, and .

Main concern

Essay exams carry most of the grade and .

What students said

“Although attendance because he gives 4 pop quizes.”
HIST1B
“He expects you to put 40 hrs of work into the midterm and for it to be flawless.”
HIST1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The main exam risk is detailed essay testing, often with questions provided in advance but strict expectations for .

Essay MidtermEssay FinalAdvance QuestionsPop QuizzesMuseum PaperNo Extra Credit

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals, advance questions, and pop quizzes, but do not clearly prove open-book rules or proctoring details.

Essay MidtermEssay FinalAdvance QuestionsPop QuizzesMuseum PaperNo Extra Credit
“STUDY FOR EXAMS!! WORTH 70% OF GRADE!!”
HIST102
“ remember all of the points for the topics.”
HISTORY1B
“he gives you the exact question a week in advance.”
HIST1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“2 DETAILED ESSAY exams (most of your grade). 1 five-page essay on a visit to a museum (few choices). Several quizzes but he always tells you what to expect the class before. Come to class, do the outline, get an A”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“He knows the subject VERY extensively.”

⚖️

35/100

“it was hard to figure out what he wanted.”

📝

82/100

“STUDY FOR EXAMS!! WORTH 70% OF GRADE!!”

👍 Recommendation Split

55/100

“Great professor, .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Dr. Guillow was a great lecturer and made every class very interesting.
  • Gives a lot of extra trivia facts, but mostly just teaches from powerpoint.
  • this guy is sooo boring

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A but you must attend all classes.
  • .
  • No .

Theme 3

📝 About Exams

  • Only reason I got a C is because . STUDY FOR EXAMS!! WORTH 70% OF GRADE!!
  • He gives the .
  • 2 DETAILED ESSAY exams (most of your grade).

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

55

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years provide rich detail, though opinions are highly polarized.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 511
3 out of 513
2 out of 56
1 out of 59

Course coverage

HIST1A14 reviews
HIST1B4 reviews
HISTHIST4 reviews
HISTORY33 reviews
HIST12 reviews
Show 19 more courses
HIST1012 reviews
HIST1022 reviews
HIST42 reviews
HISTORY2 reviews
HIS101A1 review
HISORY31 review
HIST1 review
HIST011 review
HIST18771 review
HIST23321 review
HISTB1 review
HISTO04101 review
HISTO1B1 review
HISTORY1A1 review
HISTORY1B1 review
HISTORY41 review
HST1B1 review
ONLINEHIST1B1 review
WORLDHISTORY1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values