AI Rate Professor

Physical Education

M Fenison

HLTH8056 · PE1 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
40/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you mainly want an easy A and do not care much about teaching quality.

Best fit · Easy A HunterBoring classEasy ALow learning valueImpatientPoor teaching
  • One review says the class is an easy A but a waste of time.
  • Both reviews are negative about teaching quality or classroom experience.
  • The main appeal is low grade effort, not learning.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

One student directly says you can get an A by sitting through the boring class, despite poor teaching.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online grade evidence.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The class may be grade-easy, but the experience is not intellectually strong and one review rates difficulty high.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they conflict between easy A and high difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do , though the easy-A comment implies sitting through class matters.

All evidence is in person, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Students mostly discourage taking him because the class is boring, low-value, and poorly taught.

Recommendation and is negative overall.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

One review directly frames the course as an easy A, though the evidence base is small.

Format shift

, and the leniency claim comes from one review.

Workload

Light

75/100

The easy-A comment suggests low effort, but the small sample prevents high confidence.

Format shift

All workload evidence is in person and mostly indirect.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Reviews describe the class as boring, low-value, impatient, and badly taught.

Format shift

, and both are negative about teaching quality.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do .

Format shift

, and there is no online evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

, and a possible easy A.

Main concern

Students may learn little and find the teaching frustrating.

What students said

“his class is a waste of time.”
HLTH8056
“Has no patience with the students and sometimes snaps at his students.”
PE1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or formal test format.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to sit through a boring class and get an A, . If .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching quality and grade effort. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Horrible teacher.”

📈 Easy A Tradeoff

82/100

“If you want to sit through a boring class and get an A, .”

⚠️ Student Experience

28/100

“Honestly, his class is a waste of time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I didn't learn very much from him, and his class was boring.
  • Has no patience with the students and sometimes snaps at his students.
  • Horrible teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • If you want to sit through a boring class and get an A, .
  • If .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and they give limited detail despite a .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HLTH80561 review
PE11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values