AI Rate Professor

Communication

Norrie Abbassi

SPCH3 · SPEEC3 · COM1 · SPCH13 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
53/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you are comfortable with participation, group presentations, and a tougher path to an A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardParticipation RequiredGroup ProjectsHard GraderBook-Based LecturesMixed Reviews
  • Students disagree sharply, with some recommending her and .
  • An A appears difficult because of , and .
  • The class suits students willing to participate, manage group work, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A requires strong participation, , and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Speech content may be typical, but , and .

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, but participation and presentations make showing up important.

Only in-person reviews mention participation-related expectations.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

She may work for engaged students, but , and surprise assignments create real hesitation.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students report , and tests beyond the study guide.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The course includes major group presentations, random presentations, essay exams, participation, and a .

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Some students find her cool and recommend her, while others call the class boring, unfair, and book-based.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades appear to mix presentations, group projects, participation, a , and written work.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a participation-heavy class with , and mixed teaching quality.

Main concern

Students warn that grading and .

What students said

“To get an A you have to participate and .”
SPCH3
“ . Can only miss 22 points to have an A.”
SPCH3
“unfair.boring. cannot even speak infront of a class.”
SPEEC3

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The but not very friendly because the midterm and and may test beyond the study guide.

Midterm and FinalEssay QuestionsStudy Guide Mismatch

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and one final with four essay questions, but do not clearly prove book policy or proctoring.

Midterm and FinalEssay QuestionsStudy Guide Mismatch
“1 midterm and final which are both 4 essay questions.”
SPCH3
“Gives study guide but guide.”
SPCH3

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“To get an A you have to participate and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“She teaches straight from the book.”

📈 Grade Difficulty

35/100

“ . Can only miss 22 points to have an A.”

🗣️ Participation Load

35/100

“If you do not like to participate this class is not for you.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Yeah she lectures book but hey isnt speech1 the same everywhere?
  • unfair.boring. cannot even speak infront of a class.
  • She teaches straight from the book.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • To get an A you have to participate and .
  • Grades hard.
  • Can only miss 22 points to have an A.

Theme 3

🎤 About Presentations

  • 2 major group presentations.
  • Random other presentations that were not on syllabus.
  • and challenging.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because but opinions are inconsistent and the sample is small.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

SPCH32 reviews
COM11 review
SPCH131 review
SPEEC31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values