AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Paul Wazniak

MATHAMATICS · MATH170 · MATH10B · MATH9444 · MATH70 · MATH180 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a and are willing to study for harder tests.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear Math ExplanationsHelpful TeacherHard TestsLots of NotesGood for Serious Students
  • Students strongly praise Wazniak for .
  • , but students say studying, notes, and attention make success realistic.
  • Homework and notes require consistency, with helping the grade.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

One student says easy A, but , and homework as the real cost of the grade.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

He makes math easier to understand, but the concepts and and study.

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Students are told to be on time and copy board work, but .

Only in-person reviews mention attendance-related behavior, mainly as practical advice.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students recommend him because and helps serious students succeed.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Homework can count as and one review says easy A, but .

Format shift

and .

Workload

Moderate

54/100

The workload includes lots of notes and , but it is manageable and can support the grade.

Format shift

In-person reviews describe note-heavy classes and .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students , and strong at simplifying difficult math.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

63/100

Tests matter and can be hard, but homework and notes also play an important role.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews praise his clarity and help, while warning that tests and .

Main concern

and the class can feel boring or note-heavy.

What students said

“Very intelligent and a concise lecturer.”
MATH180
“ , but just study and you'll be fine!”
MATH170
“you have like two pages at least of .”
MATH70

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as hard but studyable, with .

Hard TestsBoard Work Similar To TestsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and similar to board work, but do not clearly prove exam rules or proctoring.

Hard TestsBoard Work Similar To TestsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“ , but just study and you'll be fine!”
MATH170
“What ever he wrote on the board is similar to the test.”
MATH70

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He made everything so easy!”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Very intelligent and a concise lecturer.”

🧮 Course Challenge

58/100

“ , but just study and you'll be fine!”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very intelligent and a concise lecturer.
  • The .
  • He is a .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Good Professor! EASY A
  • , but just study and you'll be fine!
  • you have like two pages at least of .

Theme 3

❤️ About Helpfulness

  • Math is not my subjec, but and at times funny.
  • the very basics

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Eight older reviews are mostly consistent and detailed enough to identify teaching quality, workload, and test difficulty.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1702 reviews
MATH702 reviews
MATH10B1 review
MATH1801 review
MATH94441 review
Show 1 more courses
MATHAMATICS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values