AI Rate Professor

Education

Antoinette Phillips

CHILDDEV8 · CDV103 · CD8 · CDCD · CHDEV3 · CD18 · CD · CHILDDEVELOPME · CDEV4123 · CDEV · CD16 · CD81931 · CD3 · CHILDDEVELOP · CDEV3 · CDEV4115 · CDEV9 · CDEV103 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you can work independently, meet every deadline, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProStrict graderUnclear directionsKnowledgeable but rigidSelf-taught feelMixed teaching quality
  • Students are sharply split, with some calling her knowledgeable and others calling her rude, vague, or unhelpful.
  • Getting an A appears difficult because of strict grading, firm due dates, no , and .
  • Several reviews describe the course as straightforward if work is done on time, but the teaching support is inconsistent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is possible for organized students, but strict due dates, harsh grading, no , and .

All authoritative format evidence is in person, even when some comments mention online experiences.

Is the course easy?

Standard

47/100

Several students say the work is straightforward, but and comprehensive expectations raise the practical difficulty.

All evidence is counted as in person, with no separate online review count.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Students emphasize punctuality, deadlines, and unforgiving policies more than flexible participation.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Many students warn against taking her because they found her harsh, vague, rude, or unhelpful despite her subject knowledge.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Multiple students say she grades harshly, gives no , and makes missing an A .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload is usually manageable but requires steady reading, discussions, homework, reports, activities, or a portfolio on time.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

She is often described as knowledgeable, but many students report vague directions, poor help, boredom, and rude responses.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Reviews mention tests, homework, discussions, reports, activities, and portfolios, so assessment appears mixed.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but strict and inconsistent instructor whose classes reward punctual, independent students.

Main concern

Students repeatedly complain about harsh grading, poor responsiveness, vague directions, and low compassion.

What students said

“If you miss an .”
CDEV3
“She knows her stuff, but .”
CD16
“Strict on due dates, but fair.”
CDEV103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and comprehensive exams, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Comprehensive ExamsTests MentionedExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and comprehensive exams but do not clearly prove exam rules or proctoring.

Comprehensive ExamsTests Mentioned
“ though out and comprehensive.”
CD3
“read and and and test or report on time”
CDEV103

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you miss an . No or make up. Unsympathetic.”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“She knows her stuff, but .”

⚖️

20/100

“she grades to harshly and doesn't give and no make up work”

👍 Recommendation Level

35/100

“ and take another teacher!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She knows her stuff, but .
  • Professor is is not .
  • Great teacher!! Really enjoyed her lectures!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • If you miss an .
  • She is a very hard teacher
  • Strict on due dates, but fair.

Theme 3

❤️ About Personality And Support

  • Rude, crass, unforgiving, and uncompassionate.
  • she is a source of inspiration.
  • She questions every idea or question u have in an almost rude way.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

There are 26 reviews across several years with detailed and consistent themes, though the data is old and opinions are mixed.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 58
3 out of 53
2 out of 58
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CD163 reviews
CD33 reviews
CD2 reviews
CD82 reviews
CDEV1032 reviews
Show 13 more courses
CDEV32 reviews
CD181 review
CD819311 review
CDCD1 review
CDEV1 review
CDEV41151 review
CDEV41231 review
CDEV91 review
CDV1031 review
CHDEV31 review
CHILDDEV81 review
CHILDDEVELOP1 review
CHILDDEVELOPME1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values