AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

E Sedgwick

PHILOSOPHY8 · PHILO2694 · PHIL7 · PHI2 · PHILO2 · PHIL2 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take her only if you can keep up with and want a philosophy course with some grade support but .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy readingStrict gradingTake-home examsExtra creditMixed teaching quality
  • Students report a and writing load, especially in philosophy courses.
  • Teaching reviews are mixed, with and knowledgeable while others find her boring or strict.
  • Take-home exams and help, but and strict grading create risk.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

and take-home exams help, but , and strict grading keep the A from being easy.

All reviews are counted as in person, even though some student comments describe taking the course online.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The philosophy content is manageable for interested students but challenging to fully comprehend for others.

All format evidence is counted as in person under the supplied data.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

No online format exists by the authoritative count, and in-person comments .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Students are split between praising her care and , and .

All recommendation evidence is assigned to in-person reviews by the supplied format flags.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Several comments mention strict grading and a plagiarism issue, though can soften the course.

Format shift

as in person according to the supplied counts.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students repeatedly describe a lot of reading, many assignments, essays, and exams.

Format shift

Workload evidence is entirely counted as in person.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Some students call her caring and knowledgeable, while others describe her as .

Format shift

Teaching evidence is all treated as in person.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews , and multiple exams.

Format shift

Assessment evidence is entirely from reviews counted as in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Authoritative counts classify all reviews as in person, though some comments say the class was taken online.

Main concern

, and strict grading are the main risks.

What students said

“if you dont have time to study & keep up with a heavy .”
PHILOSOPHY8
“ and very difficult and she graded very strictly.”
PHIL2
“ and lots of .”
PHI2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and , but proctoring and book policies are not clearly proven.

Take-Home ExamsTake-Home QuizzesExtra CreditExam policy partly unclear

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person-counted , and , but do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules.

Take-Home ExamsTake-Home QuizzesExtra Credit
“ and lots of .”
PHI2
“ AND GIVES .”
PHILO2
“ ”
PHIL2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and very difficult and she graded very strictly.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and teaching style. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“there was a lot of reading and a lot of assignments(9:500word essays) and 5:35question exams.”

⚖️

35/100

“ and very difficult and she graded very strictly.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“Mz. Sedgwick is definately a good teacher who not only cares about what she teaches but also cares for the students.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • she assigns A LOT of reading, so be ready for that.
  • if you dont have time to study & keep up with a heavy .
  • there was a lot of reading and a lot of assignments(9:500word essays) and 5:35question exams.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • and lots of .
  • A , so future takers should watch out.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's BORING!!!
  • , but her class is extremely boring
  • she not only cares about what she teaches but also cares for the students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews give useful but mixed evidence, with old dates and inconsistent format descriptions reducing confidence.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL24 reviews
PHI21 review
PHIL71 review
PHILO21 review
PHILO26941 review
Show 1 more courses
PHILOSOPHY81 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values