AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jamel Kammoun

MATH40 · MATH70 · ALGTRIG · MATH150 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if and want a fair but attendance-dependent math class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardMixed clarityAccent concernsFair testsShow up to succeedHomework matters
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, ranging from excellent and and hard to understand.
  • Many students say success is possible if you attend, pay attention, and .
  • Several , and handling of confused students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

An A is realistic with attendance and and a dropped lowest score, but .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

The math content is manageable for prepared students, but and fast confusion make it harder for weaker students.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Reviews say he takes roll and that students need to show up to do well.

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Recommendation depends on whether students can understand his explanations and , and homework.

Recommendation and is strongly mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

65/100

and some students call tests easy, but and passing as difficult.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Homework and lots of notes are common, but and the workload is not described as overwhelming.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Some students call him clear and caring, while , and accent-related difficulty.

Format shift

and years.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Comments repeatedly mention tests, a , and .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

some students praise clear teaching and easy tests, while and language barriers.

Main concern

Clarity varies a lot, especially for students who struggle with math.

What students said

“If you show up, you will do well.”
MATH70
“Heavy accent;sometimes very hard to understand.”
MATH150
“this teacher gives the !”
MATH150

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear standard and sometimes easy, with several tests, a , and one dropped lowest test, but .

Multiple TestsDropped Lowest TestFinal ExamTest Reviews

Assessment risk

Standard

66/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

before tests, and a dropped lowest score, but not proctoring or open-book rules.

Multiple TestsDropped Lowest TestFinal ExamTest Reviews
“200pt final, 4 100 point tests with lowest score dropped.”
MATH70
“Reviews the day before a test.”
MATH70
“this teacher gives the !”
MATH150

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you show up, you will do well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and class structure. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“ .”

📈 Grade Path

70/100

“If you show up, you will do well.”

⚠️ Clarity Risk

45/100

“Heavy accent;sometimes very hard to understand.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • HE IS A GOOD TEACHER HE IS SO
  • Heavy accent;sometimes very hard to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • I had him for 3 different math courses and made A+ in all of them.
  • this teacher gives the !
  • Very hard to get a passing grade.

Theme 3

📝 About Class Structure

  • . Reviews the day before a test.
  • 200pt final, 4 100 point tests with lowest score dropped.
  • Takes roll. .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews cover multiple courses over several years, with enough detail to show both consistent strengths and recurring complaints.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 57
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1508 reviews
MATH708 reviews
MATH402 reviews
ALGTRIG1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values