AI Rate Professor

English

Paul Freeborn

ENG1A · ENG6170 · ENG6523 · ENGL1C · ENGA6165 · CC · ENG84 · ENG6710 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you want a friendly English instructor and can handle occasional reading, papers, and uneven organization.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful TeacherFun LecturesGenerally EasySome Heavy ReadingMixed Organization
  • Most students describe him as helpful, fun, and easy to follow.
  • Several reviews say the class is manageable with , and .
  • A minority report serious issues with and writing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Grades seem attainable with participation, homework, reading, and quizzes, but some and reading effort.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Most students call the material easy to follow, but reading-heavy and .

, and difficulty varies by course section.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

65/100

as mandatory, but participation and keeping up with class work appear important.

In-person reviews mention participation and homework, while no online evidence exists.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

, and clear, but a few strongly negative experiences lower confidence.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Students mention easy points, manageable quizzes, and skating with a B, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

66/100

Several students say the work is limited or easy, while one reports intense reading and .

Format shift

Workload evidence is in person only and differs by section.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Teaching is mostly praised as helpful, fun, and interesting, though a few .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

, and papers, suggesting a mix with more writing than exams.

Format shift

Assessment evidence comes only from in-person English course reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and entertaining teacher with manageable work, though a few students report heavy papers or poor follow-up.

Main concern

Some students say the class can involve heavy reading, back-to-back papers, or .

What students said

“very helpful, and charming. his warm attitude makes you feel comfortable”
ENGA6165
“having to read almost the entire text and ”
CC
“ ”
ENGL1C

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and papers, but they do not clearly prove a .

Quizzes MentionedPapers MentionedReading Based Work

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and papers but do not clearly establish exam format, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Quizzes MentionedPapers Mentioned
“study for the quizzes and you should be fine !!”
ENG84
“participate and and .”
ENG6523

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and mixed student experiences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ !!!”

👍 Recommendation Level

76/100

“ ! .”

📚 Workload Balance

66/100

“not much to study.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • very helpful, and charming.
  • !!!
  • good,fun and understanding teacher.easy to follow the material.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • not hard to skate with a B.
  • participate and and .
  • just do you're hw. its easy

Theme 3

⚠️ About Problems

  • very intense class would not suggest it to anyone...
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 11 reviews show a mostly consistent positive pattern but include sparse comments and several conflicting experiences.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1A2 reviews
ENG67102 reviews
ENG842 reviews
CC1 review
ENG61701 review
Show 3 more courses
ENG65231 review
ENGA61651 review
ENGL1C1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values