AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Truc Hamai

PSYC108 · PSYC107 · PSYCH105 · PYSCH101 · PSYCH101 · PSYC124 · PSYC101 · PSYCH108 · 84 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
64.71%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if and participation and can tolerate uneven responsiveness, especially online.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizingSlow GradingMIA OnlineInspirational When PresentParticipation Heavy
  • Experience is highly polarized between devoted fans and students who felt abandoned.
  • Online sections frequently report , and long absences.
  • When , and academically demanding.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many earn A or A- by reading, participating, and writing carefully, but AI flags, tough standards, and incomplete grades appear often.

Online has more Incomplete and grade disputes; in person more A and B with effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Reading, discussion, papers, and critical thinking keep the content serious rather than intro-easy.

and participation; short-term online can feel heavier.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and discussion expectations.

Online and in person both often require presence or active participation.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

, but a large angry minority strongly warns others away.

In-person fans are louder; online complaints about absence dominate recent negatives.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Can be supportive and clear, yet tough on AI, slow to grade, and inconsistent for some students.

Format shift

Online complaints focus on zeroed AI accusations and delayed grades.

Workload

Heavy

36/100

, and participation are common across courses.

Format shift

Short-term online intensifies reading and .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Outstanding and inspiring for engaged students, but frequent reports of MIA teaching drag the overall experience.

Format shift

In person teaching praise is stronger; online quality collapses when she disappears.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Papers, discussions, reading prep, and .

Format shift

, and a research project.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person many students praise engaging, caring teaching and real-world discussion, though , and disorganization.

Main concern

Mandatory participation and speaking pressure plus occasional tough or .

What students said

“Dr. T totally cares about her students. I had childcare issues ... she told me to bring my son.”
psych-105
“if you don't like speaking in front of .”
PSYC101
“This was one of the most interesting classes I have ever taken.”
PSYC108

Remote format

Online

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some call her caring and work, and AI or late-grade shocks.

Main concern

Unresponsive periods and .

What students said

“Professor did not answer a single one my messages, required us to be present but she never was and .”
PSYC101
“We had to chase her down through other faculty, she did not reply to a single student in 8 weeks”
PSYC108
“Dr. T was a great professor. ... She's very thorough and cares deeply about her students”
PSYC108

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment mixes discussions, papers, and some quizzes or exams; friendliness depends .

Discussion HeavyPapers and ReadingQuizzes in Some SectionsAI Plagiarism Scrutiny

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person often , and a paper, with little proctoring detail.

In-Class DiscussionParticipationQuizzes and Exams in Some CoursesResearch Project
“It focused on in-class discussions, weekly quizzes, 4 exams, and .”
PSYC107
“ . Do the reading and come prepared to discuss the course.”
psych-105

Online

Online comments emphasize modules, video uploads, papers, and .

Module AssignmentsVideo ResponsesPapersSlow Grading
“for one of . I got a 0/20 and it brought my grade down A LETTER.”
PSYC101
“course is designed at a university level (eg. )”
PSYC108

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I've had many rude teachers before, but this one was the worst. Her syllabus said she'd work with students who had proof they couldn't work on a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (32 online, 18 in person), highlighting polarization, responsiveness, and workload. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Responsiveness Risk

28/100

“Absent Professor, did not grade anything until the very end of the semester.”

❤️ When She Shows Up

88/100

“She goes above and beyond for her students!!”

📚 Workload and Standards

36/100

“Get ready to read. ... Critical thinking and the ability to stay on top of relevant news events are important.”

👍 Polarized Recommendation

55/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her teaching style is engaging and fun
  • incorporates real-world examples that help make the material more relatable
  • made me love showing up to class every day

Theme 2

📉 About Online Absence

  • The professor was there at the start of the course then disappeared (MIA)!
  • she did not reply to a single student in 8 weeks
  • doesn't answer your

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • DO NOT CHEAT! Lots of students used and got busted
  • You get out of this class what you put into it
  • As long as you are active in your participation and stay on top of the an A

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

84

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across several years with rich detail and a and abandonment complaints.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 551
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 57
1 out of 522

Course coverage

PSYC10121 reviews
PSYC10811 reviews
PSYC1077 reviews
psych-1056 reviews
PYSCH1012 reviews
Show 3 more courses
PSYC1241 review
PSYCH1011 review
PSYCH1081 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

48 reported outcomes

A range

28

A+ 3 · A 20 · A- 5

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 5

C range

4

C+ 2 · C 2

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 4 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1