AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Anshika Kapur

CHEM102 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
54.55%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

strong pick if you will live in chem all semester; avoid if you need light contact and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLecture MarathonTest Heavy ChemPolarizing SupportLab HelpfulStudy Guide Driven
  • Gen Chem 2 is inherently hard; long 3-hour lectures and .
  • Students either call her caring and clarifying or unresponsive and hard to get help from.
  • Success paths stress early study guides, when offered, and never missing labs.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

Partial credit and occasional curves help, but exams and .

; online reviews rarely describe an easy A.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Gen Chem 2 content plus marathon lectures make the course intellectually and time-wise heavy.

Both formats call chem hard; online adds self-teaching friction.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Labs and participation are treated as must-show; .

; online also often marks mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

and care; others strongly warn against communication gaps and hardness.

In-person recommendations are warmer; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Partial credit and and nitpicky lab comments are common.

Format shift

In person mentions more partial credit; online more often says tough or nitpicky.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Long lectures, labs with write-ups, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Workload intensity is similar overall; online students feel less supported under the same load.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

and ; a sizable group finds her unresponsive or unclear.

Format shift

Teaching reputation is stronger in person; online communication is the main failure mode.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Quizzes, midterms, practicals, and a .

Format shift

; in person adds lab practical weight.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and curves, while and long lectures.

Main concern

3-hour lectures, delayed grading, and .

What students said

“TAKE HER CLASS!! It was overall pretty easy.”
CHEM102
“ .”
CHEM102
“ if you are prepared to devote all your time to Chemistry.”
CHEM102

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and self-teaching from long videos.

Main concern

Slow or and .

What students said

“ !!!!!!!!”
CHEM102
“Honestly, I have no idea what this professor does on the daily, but it certainly isn't teaching.”
CHEM102
“you have to basically teach yourself and if you have other classes that's not great.”
CHEM102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are hard and central, though study guides, , and .

Hard ExamsQuiz Retakes SometimesStudy Guides EarlyCurved FinalLecture Questions On Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person, exams still drive the grade, but early study guides, , and .

2 Midterms Plus FinalQuiz RetakesEarly Study GuidesCurved Final
“We had 2 exams (midterms) before the final (which she curves), 9 quizzes (can retake twice).”
CHEM102
“provides study guides early so you can start studying for the exam 3-4 weeks prior.”
CHEM102

Online

Online exams are described as incredibly hard with limited helpful review and .

Hard ExamsLong Lecture VideosSelf-Study Heavy
“ .”
CHEM102
“ . I still did fine but you have to basically teach yourself.”
CHEM102

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Gen Chem 2 is V tough, but Prof. made it 10 times easier than two other profs that failed me.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews (4 online, 18 in person), capturing the caring-versus-unresponsive split. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Split

58/100

“She was very thorough in her lectures, and made sure not to overload the class by making sure everyone was on the same page.”

🧪

42/100

“if .”

⏱️ Lecture Load

32/100

“Her lectures can be over 3 hours long for each chapter.”

👍

52/100

“TAKE HER CLASS!! It was overall pretty easy.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes her lectures easy to understand and .
  • Asking for help is a burden to her, she never has time and makes faces or can ignore you.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Just make sure you do good on the quizzes and exams and !
  • I did get a good grade in her class, but I did not like the way she taught the course.
  • she will give you partial credit on the short answer questions as long as you write down relevant information.

Theme 3

📬 About Communication

  • , if she does respond then it's weeks later.
  • .
  • Hardly gives announcements and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

22 reviews with rich detail and a stable polarizing split across years, mostly CHEM102.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CHEM10222 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

11

B+ 2 · B 9

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values