AI Rate Professor

Biology

David Haisten

MICRO125 · BIO125 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you can put serious study time into biology or micro and accept proctored hard exams for a fair shot at an A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHilarious LecturesProctored Online TestsHard ExamsClear Grading CriteriaHeavy Reading
  • and accessibility outside class
  • , and online became stressful with full proctoring
  • An A is possible with and weekly review, but many would switch professors if they could

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible with serious study, but and low class averages mean it is real work.

; in person reviews do not discuss A difficulty.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Micro and bio content plus dense reading and .

Online reviews drive the challenging rating; in person focuses on lecture fun more than content ease.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Some online and , but policy is not fully consistent.

Online notes weekly review meetings and some mandatory tags; in .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

About two-thirds would take him again, but and online stress pull the recommendation down.

In person is pure praise; online is split between love and leave.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Clear grading criteria and help, but tough grader tags and .

Format shift

Online shows fair-but-tough grading; in .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Lots of , and weekly chapter review make the load heavy.

Format shift

and homework; in person workload is not detailed.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

, and accessible, while critics attack online teaching quality and .

Format shift

In person teaching praise is very high; online quality is mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

74/100

Proctored tests dominate outcomes, with reading and study guides as .

Format shift

; in person reviews do not detail assessment mix.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The two in person reviews are glowing about hilarious entertaining lectures and .

Main concern

Sample is tiny and .

What students said

“ and entertaining lectures. .”
BIO125
“ ! Hilarious and a great lecturer. !”
BIO125

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and fair with proctored tests, others report useless study guides, class-wide complaints, and .

Main concern

Proctored filmed tests and .

What students said

“ and filmed so absolutely no cheating. and study guides provided and an A is definitely achievable.”
MICRO125
“ is 50-60 on a test in the class I would think a professor would rethink his teaching skills”
BIO125
“His class became harder and stressful when it was switched to online; everything proctored including .”
BIO125

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Online exams are proctored and filmed with reportedly hard questions, making the .

Proctored TestsFilmed ExamsHard ExamsStudy GuidesExtra Credit Proctored

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews do not clearly describe exam format or .

Online

Online tests are proctored and filmed with no cheating allowed, and students report hard averages and even proctored .

Proctored And FilmedHard TestsStudy Guides Often MismatchProctored Extra Credit
“ and filmed so absolutely no cheating.”
MICRO125
“ is 50-60 on a test in the class”
BIO125
“everything proctored including .”
BIO125

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and filmed so absolutely no cheating. and study guides provided and an A is definitely achievable.Devote lots of time”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews (4 online, 2 in person), highlighting lecture . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“ ! Hilarious and a great lecturer. !”

🧪

28/100

“ and filmed so absolutely no cheating.”

📈 Difficulty

32/100

“ is 50-60 on a test in the class”

👍 Recommendation Split

58/100

“If there are !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • totally hilarious and entertaining lectures
  • makes lectures fun and interesting
  • Good at explaining the harder subjects in an understandable way

Theme 2

📝

  • and filmed so absolutely no cheating
  • Study guides are useless, nothing on them are on the exams
  • Get ready to read

Theme 3

⚖️ About Fairness

  • He is

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews with and , but the small sample and polarized tone limit confidence.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

BIO1254 reviews
MICRO1252 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1