AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Linda Krajewski

PSYC101 · PSYH101 · PSYCH101 · PYSCH101 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if and tolerate uneven instructor contact.

Best fit · Self Taught ProGet Ready to ReadClear Criteria When OrganizedUneven CommunicationOnline Flexibility VariesMindTap Heavy
  • Student and silent late-grading disasters.
  • Reading and MindTap-style work are common; content itself is often manageable.
  • Online communication reliability is the biggest swing factor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

Some students earn easy As with clear work; others fail or and .

Online reviews include both A+ success and an ; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

Material is often readable and assignment-based, but and uneven support keep it standard, not trivial.

Difficulty feels similar across formats; online swings more with communication quality.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

as mandatory while others leave it open or flexible online.

Online attendance is often not strict; and you will not pass.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Roughly two in because terms range from excellent support to total radio silence.

Online recommendations are split; and avoid.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

54/100

Clear criteria and appear, but tough-grader notes and an .

Format shift

Online grading experience is more polarized than in-person comments.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Expect and MindTap or .

Format shift

Both formats mention reading and assignments; online adds platform work.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

and responsive; weak terms feel unreachable with almost no class communication.

Format shift

Online teaching quality swings hardest; in-person comments are milder but still mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

36/100

Quizzes, Canvas assignments, and exam focus.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize assignments and quizzes; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person or hybrid-feeling sections are mixed: some call her reasonable and easy .

Main concern

Accessibility outside class and .

What students said

“ . I took this as a summer course and was very easy to pass with an A.”
PSYC101
“ . Linda is not a good Professor.”
PSYH101
“there was not much flexibility for online class. Reccomend someone else”
PSYCH101

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online Psych 101 ranges from clear, flexible, quick-reply courses to no announcements and .

Main concern

Poor or delayed communication can leave students blind on grades.

What students said

“She waited until the end of the so I had no way of knowing my progress.”
PYSCH101
“She provided students with everything we would need and replied to emails quickly.”
PSYC101
“provided and conveyed her expectations”
PSYC101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment looks standard assignment-and-quiz based, with .

QuizzesCanvas AssignmentsReading/MindTap

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but includes a test-heavy tough-grader report.

Test Heavy
“Linda is not a good Professor.”
PSYH101

Online

Online students mention quizzes, Canvas issues, and .

QuizzesCanvas AssignmentsLate Grade Posting Risk
“ and Canvas malfunctions”
PSYC101
“She waited until the end of the ”
PYSCH101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Krajewski provided and conveyed her expectations while still maintaining the flexibility of an online class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews (4 online, 3 in person), highlighting polarized communication and manageable content. Credibility rating: Medium.

📡 Communication Swing

48/100

“Provides ZERO announcements to the class.”

📘 Reading Load

58/100

“A textbook is required with mindtap, but that made studying a lot easier.”

⭐ When It Works

70/100

“ !”

⚖️ Recommendation Split

45/100

“Reccomend someone else”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching and Access

  • replied to emails quickly
  • Hard to get ahold of
  • Why is she an online professor?

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • was very easy to pass with an A
  • and well explained
  • She waited until the end of the

Theme 3

💻 About Online Course Design

  • not much flexibility for online class
  • I was not impressed by her online course.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across online and in-person from 2018-2021 are detailed but highly polarized, lowering certainty.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PSYC1014 reviews
PSYCH1011 review
PSYH1011 review
PYSCH1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values