AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Paul Jones

CHEM100 · CHEM101 · CHEM102 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
12.5%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Run away unless you have no alternative and are ready to teach yourself chemistry with .

Best fit · Self Taught ProCancels Class ConstantlyLate GradingUnprofessionalFunny But LazyDo Not Take
  • Students repeatedly report cancelled lectures, weeks without contact, and grades posted weeks after the semester.
  • Many still earned B+ or A grades despite feeling they learned almost nothing.
  • One summer CHEM100 review is more positive, but the overall pattern is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Several students still got A or B+, but and grades often felt random or delayed.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Content feels hard mainly because lectures are cancelled and students are left unprepared for difficult exams.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

, and he himself cancelled most classes.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Nearly every because of neglect, late grades, and unprofessional conduct.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

Few graded items, multi-week delays, and reports of wrong or made-up lab scores undermine fairness.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Light

55/100

Often little instruction or feedback, but exams and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students call him funny yet repeatedly describe skipped classes, no contact, and learning almost nothing.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

and labs that are often returned late or inconsistently.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

lectures, delayed or , and unprofessional behavior, with humor noted but not enough to salvage the experience.

Main concern

Chronic cancellations, late or invented grades, and almost no communication.

What students said

“ . Paul Jones was a really funny person... However, he skipped about 60 to 70 percent of classes.”
CHEM102
“his laziness and lack of care for his students is just unforgivable.”
CHEM102
“For the whole semester I received 2 graded labs out 17 that I turned in.”
CHEM101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as difficult despite cancelled lectures, with grades often posted weeks late.

Difficult ExamsSparse Teaching Before TestsDelayed Grades

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and final grades were often delayed for weeks.

Difficult ExamsSparse Teaching Before TestsDelayed Grades
“He gave a though we barley learned anything throughout the semester because he was constantly cancelling lecture.”
CHEM102
“we had to wait 25 days after the .”
CHEM102

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Paul Jones was a really funny person... However, he skipped about 60 to 70 percent of classes.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 in-person reviews with strong negative consistency; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“I felt like I learned nothing from him.”

⏱️

20/100

“For the whole semester I received 2 graded labs out 17 that I turned in.”

👎 Recommendation

12/100

“his laziness and lack of care for his students is just unforgivable.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he skipped about 60 to 70 percent of classes
  • He was almost impossible to get in contact with
  • Always came in super hungover. Horribly unprofessional.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He gave a though we barley learned anything
  • waited until the day before the random scores
  • he did not offer a curve nor did he offer

Theme 3

💬 About Character

  • He was a funny person but besides that it was horrible.
  • I really liked Professor Jones as a person, he was a very cool guy
  • Lied a lot to the class and other professors

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eight detailed reviews from 2019-2020 are highly , and poor professionalism.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

CHEM1024 reviews
CHEM1013 reviews
CHEM1001 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values