AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Monica Lurtz

CHEM96 · CHEM101 · CHEM100 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid unless and tolerate a harsh classroom climate.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnapproachableHard TestsSelf-Teach RequiredRude PersonalityPartial Credit
  • Most students call her rude, unhelpful, and a teaching disaster in chem.
  • Tests are very hard and .
  • A few chem-major fans like the rigor, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is possible with heavy self-study and partial credit, but and .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

and unhelpful labs make the material feel much harder than a standard intro course.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, but students say you must go and still get little help if you miss concepts.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

The large majority urge others to skip her due to rudeness, unhelpful teaching, and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Several students note partial credit and occasional A or B outcomes, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Labs, homework, and is sometimes ignored.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Students repeatedly say she , and lectures are rude or unhelpful.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Hard tests and finals drive .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person chem sections dominate; , and a cold or hostile tone.

Main concern

Unhelpful teaching paired with .

What students said

“Even if its the last class . She will just destroy u.”
CHEM101
“Will have to do full tutoring or self teach yourself..and and repeat course.”
CHEM100
“Never, ever answer questions. Rude, corny jokes, boring, hard, proud, irregular, and horrible!!”
CHEM101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

with study guides, and the main grade risk.

Hard TestsFinal HeavyStudy Guides UnreliablePartial Credit

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as super hard with weak study-guide alignment and high fail risk.

Hard TestsUnreliable Study GuidesPartial Credit
“ .”
CHEM101
“The study guides dont help for the tests”
CHEM101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Even if its the last class . She will just destroy u.”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 in-person , and recommendation tone. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

28/100

“I have never seen a worse teacher.. Even if u r a chem major you will reconsider your major after taking her class.”

🚫 Recommendation

22/100

“ !!!She is the .”

🔥

35/100

“Horrible horrible teacher!!! She lives in a fallacy of Ms Right. .”

🧊 Classroom Climate

25/100

“Dr. Lurtz is arrogant. She is unapproachable. She does not belong in a teaching job.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Never, ever answer questions.
  • Lectures consist of and making aweful jokes.
  • Do it Yourself is her moto.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Turning an A student into C student is her specialty.
  • only good thing is she gives partial credit

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is arrogant. She is unapproachable.
  • She would get angry if you ever asked any type of question.
  • Bipolar !!! Had to file official complaint with Dept Head and the Dean.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

23 detailed in-person reviews spanning several years show strong consensus on poor teaching and .

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 57
1 out of 510

Course coverage

CHEM10012 reviews
CHEM10110 reviews
CHEM961 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values