AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Nanette Sebourn

GUID100 · PSYCH104 · PYSCH102 · PSYC103 · PSYC104 · PSYCH102 · PSYC101 · SOCI112 · PSYC102 · PSYCH101 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Avoid unless you specifically want discussion-heavy personal-growth style classes and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProMisses class oftenGroup-therapy styleBoundary concernsPolarizing reviewsCharged unpaid extra credit
  • some call her amazing and relatable, many call her unprofessional.
  • Repeated complaints about missing class, putting on movies, and charging $40 for unused .
  • Several students felt pressured to share personal life as if in group therapy.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Some sections are easy with few or no tests, but others feel unfair with grade errors and uneven effort reward.

All evidence comes from 16 In person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is often light or discussion-based, though some students found the class hard due to chaos not rigor.

All evidence comes from In person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

She often missed class herself, so and unreliable.

All evidence comes from In person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

More students warn not to take her than praise her, citing unprofessionalism and wasted time.

All evidence comes from In person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Some call grades easy; , and grades lower than effort.

Format shift

All evidence from In person reviews.

Workload

Light

72/100

Often discussion and notebook based with few tests in some sections; .

Format shift

All evidence from In person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

caring and fun for some, absent, hung-over, movie-heavy, and invasive for many.

Format shift

All evidence from In person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Many classes stress discussions, notebooks, and personal growth over formal exams.

Format shift

All evidence from In person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and related courses; while critics cite absences, pseudo-science, and invasive personal questions.

Main concern

Frequent absences, unprofessional boundary crossing, and grades not matching effort.

What students said

“She crosses some serious professional boundaries and needs to be put in her place.”
PSYC103
“she charged everyone in the class $40 for !”
PSYCH102
“Great Teacher, No tests!!!! only read the book for the notebooks you turn in when you tell her you want to.”
PSYCH104

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Several courses have no or few formal exams and rely on notebooks and discussions instead.

Few or no tests in some sectionsTests only in some coursesNotebook-based assessment

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Some sections have no tests; others use easy tests or notebooks turned in when students choose.

No tests in some coursesEasy tests reportedNotebook submissions
“Great Teacher, No tests!!!! only read the book for the notebooks you turn in when you tell her you want to.”
PSYCH104
“easy tests. lectures may seem like common sense”
GUID100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . If she ever showed up it was to watch nauseating movies that made me extremely uncomfortable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting polarization, absences, and boundary concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Professionalism Concerns

28/100

“Ms. Sebourn was extremely unprofessional and invasive, and made me very uncomfortable.”

👎 Recommendation Split

35/100

“ !”

💬 Therapy-Style Class

40/100

“Class is set up more like group therapy then a classroom.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she NEVER showed up, and when she did she was annoyed
  • Most of the lessons have no discernable aim
  • She is AMAZING! I took her for Gender Psychology and loved her.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and was very easy
  • Made you think the class was going to be no stress then give a lower grade
  • Great Teacher, No tests!!!!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Boundaries

  • She crosses some serious professional boundaries
  • all the personal questions are frankly just creepy
  • Nanette talks to you as if she is assessing you as a shrink not a teacher.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

16 reviews with rich detail and , but polarized opinions and all from 2007-2010.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

PSYC1034 reviews
PSYC1022 reviews
PSYCH1012 reviews
PSYCH1042 reviews
GUID1001 review
Show 5 more courses
PSYC1011 review
PSYC1041 review
PSYCH1021 review
PYSCH1021 review
SOCI1121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values