AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lana Anishchenko

MATH400 · STAT300 · MATH300 · MATH131 · MATH340 · STAT301 · MATH100 · STATS300 · 144 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
73%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you can handle steady work and , but avoid if you need very flexible deadlines or dislike self-guided learning.

Best fit · Effort For RewardWell Organized OnlineGroup Project HeavyHelpful When ReachedInconsistent In PersonLots of Homework
  • Online STAT and MATH reviews are usually positive because the course , and some work can be retried.
  • Negative reviews , and confusing in-person instruction.
  • Getting a good grade is possible, but students must keep up with , and practice assignments.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is realistic because there are retries, , and clear practice, but the workload and .

Online evidence is stronger for retries and , while because some students report tough grading and lost points.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The course and practice are used, but statistics and math still require steady study.

Online reviews often describe the setup as clear, while needing to learn from homework.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Attendance is optional in some online sections but .

Online attendance varies by section, while lost credit.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and helpful feedback, but a sizable group strongly warns against the workload and group structure.

Online reviews lean more recommended, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grading can be helped by retries, , and clear criteria, but some students report tough or .

Format shift

Online reviews mention and multiple attempts more often, while in-person reviews include more complaints about unexplained deductions.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and daily effort.

Format shift

Both formats show steady workload, but and group collaboration.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

She is often described as , and helpful, but negative reviews cite and weak support during problems.

Format shift

Online teaching is viewed more favorably, while and empathy.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

, and practice work rather than one single method.

Format shift

Online STAT reviews often emphasize projects and quizzes, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are sharply mixed, with and others calling the grading and class structure confusing.

Main concern

Mandatory attendance, group work, and reviews.

What students said

“ .”
STAT300
“ . Asking for .”
STAT300
“ .”
STAT300

Remote format

Online

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive but , and occasional slow communication.

Main concern

Group work and steady weekly workload can hurt students who fall behind.

What students said

“ and straight forward.”
STAT300
“The class requires a lot of work, but if you reach out.”
STAT300
“DON'T DO IT. Ruined my GPA.”
STAT300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk varies by course because some sections use tests and quizzes, while several statistics reviews describe projects or redo opportunities instead of a .

Practice AssignmentsQuizzesProjects Instead of ExamsSimilar Practice ExamsRetakes or Redos

Assessment risk

Varies

66/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person , and practice exams; reviews do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring.

Straightforward ExamsPop QuizzesGroup ProjectPractice Exams
“ .”
MATH400
“ , and a ”
STAT300
“ ”
STAT300

Online

Online reviews mention practice assignments, quizzes, similar practice exams, and one STAT section with a project instead of exams; reviews do not clearly prove webcam or strict proctoring.

Practice AssignmentsQuizzesProjects Instead of ExamsSimilar Practice Exams
“I am scared of exams, and this class had project instead.”
STAT300
“ and the ”
MATH300
“You have plenty of .”
MATH300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Good prof but you have to do your part and work for it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“ and straight forward.”

📚 Workload

38/100

“The class requires a lot of work, but if you reach out.”

⚖️

58/100

“ , and there are .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I really liked how this course was taught, and I feel it helped it be one of .
  • Professor Anishchenko is a great teacher and really helped me understand how to actually do math in this class and in general.
  • Lectures are often confusing, immediately giving us groupwork, usually without going over examples first.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You need to put in effort and time you need, and you will do better than you think(I did).
  • Make sure you do all homework or you will not be credited for all units.
  • Lots of .

Theme 3

🤝 About Group Work

  • Group collaboration might be frustrating at times if your group doesn't care and wants to do sloppy work.
  • group work does not work unless your entire group is willing to participate.
  • Forced to work with group of her choice, even if they don't show up or help group work!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

144

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 recent reviews across online and in-person formats with repeated patterns , and grading.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 557
4 out of 546
3 out of 517
2 out of 510
1 out of 514

Course coverage

STAT30026 reviews
MATH30016 reviews
MATH3402 reviews
STATS3002 reviews
MATH1001 review
Show 3 more courses
MATH1311 review
MATH4001 review
STAT3011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 3 · A 4

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 4

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1