AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Binh Truong

CALCULUSIIII · STAT300 · STAT480 · MATH401 · M402 · DE · MATH402 · DIFEQ · MATH410 · MATH420 · CALC2 · CALCULUS2 · STATS300 · 255 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
34.52%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself math with little support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-taught courseUnresponsive communicationOutsourced homework systemsHeavy WebAssign workloadUnclear grading
  • Many students say the course is mostly self-teaching through textbook notes, Pearson, WebAssign, Cengage, or YouTube.
  • Grades can still be possible because of , and .
  • The main risk , and weak instruction.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Good grades are possible because , but students often pay for it by self-teaching.

Online evidence shows possible A grades despite poor teaching, while in person evidence is thinner and mixed.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The math content is hard mainly because students report , and weak preparation for exams.

Online reviews show the strongest self-teaching burden, while in person reviews repeat similar concerns with .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

78/100

, but the course still requires staying on top of online platforms and due dates.

Most online reviews , while in person reviews as the core issue.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most negative reviews advise avoiding him because students feel unsupported, ignored, and .

Online recommendations are especially negative, while in person reviews include a few positive outliers but still show major risk.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Some students report retakes, extensions, rounding, or high grades, but , and few graded items.

Format shift

Online grading can be lenient in statistics sections but harsh or and differential equations; in person evidence is mixed.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Many reviews mention lots of , and self-study burden.

Format shift

Online workload is dominated by WebAssign, Pearson, Cengage, quizzes, and exams, while in person and exams.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

The dominant complaint is that he does not teach, does not communicate, and provides weak or unusable notes.

Format shift

Online teaching quality is rated especially poorly, while in person reviews also report self-teaching and limited help.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Assessment commonly includes platform homework, quizzes, tests, and and due dates.

Format shift

Online sections rely heavily , and exams; in person sections also emphasize exams and homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In person reviews are also mixed to negative, with some students saying he does not teach, though a few mention or easier grades.

Main concern

Instruction may still feel self-taught even outside the online format.

What students said

“Only do this class if you can teach yourself.”
MATH410
“This guy does not teach at all.”
MATH402
“easy A if you hustle”
MATH420

Remote format

Online

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, repeatedly describing no , and outsourced platforms.

Main concern

Students may need to teach themselves while managing unclear deadlines, tests, and grading.

What students said

“In essence, you have to teach yourself calc 3.”
MATH402
“Exports the entire class to webassign, including exams.”
MATH420
“No video lectures or office hours, He wants you to study on your on.”
MATH410

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam policy varies by course, with clear evidence of platform-based tests and one Lockdown Browser mention but .

WebAssign ExamsCengage Tests And QuizzesLockdown Browser MentionedNo Proctorio MentionedTake-Home And In-Class Exams Mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person exam evidence is limited and mixed, including take-home and in-class exams .

Take-Home Exams MentionedIn-Class Exams MentionedCurve Ball QuestionsLittle Exam Preparation
“ and some in-class exams.”
MATH420
“He throws curve ball questions with 0 relation to the .”
MATH410

Online

Online reviews , and one Lockdown Browser case without Proctorio.

WebAssign ExamsCengage Tests And QuizzesLockdown BrowserNo Proctorio MentionedUnclear Due Dates
“ browser but he doesn't use proctorio.”
MATH402
“tests and .”
CALCULUSIIII
“Exports the entire class to webassign, including exams.”
MATH420

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“YOU WILL BE TEACHING YOURSELF EVERYTHING.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“There were . Zero information or .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“ if you have a choice.”

📚 Self-Teaching Burden

32/100

“The whole .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He DOES NOT TEACH, he just gives typed lecture notes and lets you read the textbook.
  • This guy does not teach at all.
  • Pinnacle of teaching yourself.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • An A is very possible but just do "view example" on Pearson if you don't understand.
  • The professor does round up grades for the most part, and , and unlimited attempts on the homework.
  • easy A if you hustle

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication

  • an email with a single word.
  • Don't even bother sending an email as you will not get a response.
  • Expect little to no communication and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

255

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The evidence is strong because 50 reviews across multiple years repeat the same self-teaching, platform, and communication complaints.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 555
4 out of 545
3 out of 534
2 out of 537
1 out of 584

Course coverage

MATH40213 reviews
MATH41012 reviews
MATH42011 reviews
STAT3004 reviews
3101 review
Show 9 more courses
CALC21 review
CALCULUS21 review
CALCULUSIIII1 review
DE1 review
DIFEQ1 review
M4021 review
MATH4011 review
stat4801 review
STATS3001 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 3 · A 13 · A- 2

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

20

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 18 · Rather not say 1