AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Bryan White

MATH400 · MAT410 · MATH25 · MATH401 · MATH330 · MATH140 · MATH32 · MAT400 · MATH410 · MATH310 · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you can self-manage and grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardUnorganized but kindSlow gradingTest heavyExtra creditTake-home exams
  • Students and knowledgeable but .
  • Grades , and .
  • Online reviews are much worse because communication and grade updates were weak.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

A is realistic because homework, , and , but students still need steady work.

The easy-A evidence is stronger in person, while online students got A grades but reported weaker learning and support.

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

The math content is often conceptually hard, especially linear algebra and .

Online reviews mention either easy structure or weak support, while in-person .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

56/100

Attendance rules vary by class, with several mandatory reports but .

Online attendance evidence is limited, while and optional policies.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

and patience, but because of disorganization and slow communication.

Online reviews are consistently negative, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

, and better-score policies make grading more forgiving than the tests suggest.

Format shift

, while online reviews mostly complain about grade visibility.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Homework and reading are frequent, but several students say doing the .

Format shift

Online reviews mention WebAssign and , while homework.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

He is often described as kind and knowledgeable, but many students say .

Format shift

Online teaching experience is weaker due to poor contact, while and student style.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

76/100

Reviews repeatedly mention multiple exams, finals, and .

Format shift

Both formats mention exams, but and group finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with strong praise for fairness and kindness but repeated complaints about and .

Main concern

The and lecture quality varies.

What students said

“He gives difficult tests, but as long as .”
MATH400
“He is a really nice professor but his teaching style is all over the place and he knows it.”
MAT410

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report poor communication, late grades, and little instructional support.

Main concern

You may not know your grade and may need to teach yourself.

What students said

“The prof. was very hard to contact and never updated the grades, so you don't really know how well you're doing in class.”
MATH400
“His communication is horrible, so if this .”
MAT410

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams can be difficult, but and make the overall exam risk more student-friendly.

Take-Home ExamsExtra CreditTest HeavyGroup Final

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person , and group exam formats in some classes.

Take-Home MidtermsTake-Home FinalGroup Final
“Had 2 take home midterms. and 1 final exam, but he let us do the .”
MAT410
“3 Take home exams, 1 in .”
MATH401

Online

Online reviews mention three exams and a final, but do not .

Three ExamsFinal Exam
“We had 3 exams and a final exam only 1 week after exam #3.”
MATH400

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is a really nice professor but his teaching style is all over the place and he knows it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“He is a really nice professor but his teaching style is all over the place and he knows it.”

⚖️

68/100

“He offers a decent amount of and alternative ways to help boost your grade.”

🧪

78/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He knows how to teach the class though. .
  • He does not prepare lessons and it shows.
  • He is a good teacher overall.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Work

  • He gives difficult tests, but as long as .
  • and will go out of his way to help you.
  • Also really slow with grading.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 37 reviews across many years, with , and workload.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 56
3 out of 56
2 out of 58
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MAT41015 reviews
MATH255 reviews
MATH3305 reviews
MATH4003 reviews
MATH3102 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATH4012 reviews
MATH4102 reviews
MAT4001 review
MATH1401 review
MATH321 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 1 · A 10

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 6