AI Rate Professor

History

Camille Leonhardt

HIST340 · HIST330 · HIST332 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
69.23%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if and want clear directions with a strong chance at a good grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear grading criteriaHeavy readingHelpful feedbackExtra creditBetter in person
  • Grades are usually strong when students follow instructions and complete the reading-heavy work.
  • mixed online reviews.
  • The and writing, not hard content.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

85/100

Getting an A is realistic if students finish the reading and writing, follow directions, and use when offered.

Online evidence shows an easy grade with steady work, while and more .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

The content is not described as hard, but the amount of reading and writing keeps it from being effortless.

Online students describe more reading fatigue, while and easier assignments.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

but mandatory in most in-person reviews.

Online attendance evidence is mixed but , while .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and feedback, though online reviews warn that the format can be dull and reading-heavy.

, while online recommendation is positive but more divided.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Most students say , but a few online reviews describe picky grading on writing.

Format shift

and , while online reviews include both full-credit comments and tough-grader complaints.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload is steady because students repeatedly mention lots of reading, weekly writing, and quizzes.

Format shift

Online workload sounds heavier because it relies more on reading and writing, while as simpler.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

, and in-person lectures, but some online students call the recorded lectures dull.

Format shift

In-person teaching is consistently praised, while online teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Grades appear driven mostly by writing, weekly assignments, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize weekly assignments and quizzes, while , and assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person sections receive very strong praise for , and .

Main concern

, and the class still expects reading.

What students said

“ and the assignments were pretty simple and tons of .”
HIST332
“She goes over what will be on them.”
HIST330

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and grade-friendly, but several students found them reading-heavy, dull, or picky on writing.

Main concern

The online format and weekly writing with limited lecture value.

What students said

“The rest of the class is essentially ALL reading, and .”
HIST332
“as long as you complete the work correctly she'll give you full credit.”
HIST340

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, tests, and assignments, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or .

Weekly QuizzesWriting AssignmentsTests MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a possible last exam waiver, but they do not clearly prove book rules or .

QuizzesTestsPossible Last Exam Waiver
“ and tests.”
HIST330
“If you do well on your assignments .”
HIST330

Online

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes and assignments, but they do not clearly .

Weekly QuizzesWriting AssignmentsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“Had either a and the ”
HIST340

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Overall, this was a good class, all material came with .”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course format. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“I liked that Prof Leonhardt provided detailed comments on every assignment which definitely helped in the beginning.”

📈 Easy Grade Path

85/100

“If you followed the instructions, you received a good grade.”

⚠️

48/100

“There is a ton of .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She lectures each day but for us to remember.
  • Her recorded lectures are incredibly dull; she basically just reads a short script to you.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The work she assigned (e.g. Historical Reflections and Documentary Source Analysis) was very simple with and she also offered opportunities.
  • Even when meeting all requirements laid out in the instructions and on my submissions and not tell me specifically why.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • There will be a lot of and writing.
  • The writing was annoying and tedious, but not hard.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 13 recent reviews across online and , and format differences.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HIST3307 reviews
HIST3324 reviews
HIST3402 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 3 · A 8

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values