AI Rate Professor

Legal Assisting

Keith Staten

LA334 · LA347 · LA342 · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
70.59%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take him if you want practical legal insight and can handle a loose lecture style, but if and fast grading.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerReal-World ExamplesLecture HeavyParticipation MattersDisorganized CanvasEngaging Storyteller
  • Students who like practical law stories often find him memorable, inspiring, and useful.
  • Students who need structure often , and weak Canvas use.
  • Attendance and participation matter, and his long lectures are central to the course experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Many students get A or B grades, but success depends on showing up, participating, and tolerating loose organization.

In-person evidence makes the grade path clearer, while online evidence and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

He often makes legal concepts easier through stories, but the subject and lecture style still require attention.

, while online reviews are more affected by organization problems.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

because participation and lecture content drive performance.

as mandatory, and in-person comments especially stress showing up.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and engaging lectures, but only if students can handle a less structured course.

In-person recommendations are stronger, while online reviews are more sharply divided.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grades can be good, but students report , and subjective homework in some sections.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews more often call him fair.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

The workload is usually not huge, but long lectures, participation, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention homework and quiz timing issues, while .

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

He is praised as knowledgeable and practical, but disorganization and rambling lectures create a real fit issue.

Format shift

In-person teaching reads stronger, while online and .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

, and a final, with participation also important.

Format shift

Both formats combine assignments and exams, but .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are more consistently positive, especially about storytelling, real examples, and class discussions.

Main concern

Long lectures and required participation may not fit students who want tight structure.

What students said

“This Professor is a wonderful story teller and so is in providing a narrative in the courtroom when presenting or using evidence.”
LA342
“Lectures are engaging with plenty of real world examples.”
LA334
“Expect to stay the entire 3 hours.”
LA334

Remote format

Online

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are polarized, with strong praise for real-world teaching and strong criticism of , and organization.

Main concern

The and dependent on long live lectures.

What students said

“Professor Keith is AMAZING! He wants to see his students succeed.”
LA342
“ , and takes months to grade your work.”
LA342
“Lectures and , and assignments often referenced nonexistent readings.”
LA334

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, midterms, and finals, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or strict proctoring rules.

Multiple Choice MidtermFinalQuizzesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring policy.

Multiple Choice MidtermFinal
“One homework each week, multiple interesting readings, a , and final.”
LA342
“ , and final.”
LA334

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, midterms, and finals, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book policy.

QuizzesMidtermsFinals
“ and short turn around times on quizzes from when they are posted/notified to closed.”
LA334
“check your own Midterms and ”
LA334

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Traditional students who depend on Canvas and like structure may not appreciate his style, but I love that I learned through his effective storytelling.”

Voice snapshots generated from 34 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“Professor Staten makes legal concepts easy to digest.”

🧭 Organization Risk

42/100

“ , and takes months to grade your work.”

👍 Recommendation Fit

72/100

“Do not let the negative reviews intimidate you. Professor Keith is a VERY knowledgeable professor and attorney!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Uses real world examples to make concepts easily understood.
  • This Professor is a wonderful story teller.
  • He makes legal concepts easy to digest.

Theme 2

🧩 About Structure

  • Lectures and , and assignments often referenced nonexistent readings.
  • but goes over answers the end of class.
  • Teaching style is an incoherent babbling of stories that is not related to the assigned book.

Theme 3

📈

  • and ace the exams and you'll be fine.
  • If you attend class regularly and participate, you will probably get a good grade.
  • Expect to stay the entire 3 hours.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

34

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The evidence is strong because 34 reviews cover both formats and show repeated agreement on lectures, participation, organization, and .

Inside 34 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 57

Course coverage

LA33419 reviews
LA34214 reviews
LA3471 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

29 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 3 · A 14

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 5

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 4