AI Rate Professor

History

Olivera Garasinin

HIST300 · HIST300WESTCIV · HIST305 · HIST307 · HIS307 · 138 lifetime ratings

AI rating
4/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
4.6

The decision

unless you want a and can handle low support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh graderLecture heavyTest heavyDense readingLow support
  • Students and little useful feedback.
  • Both online and , and test-heavy.
  • A small minority respect her knowledge, but most advise taking another professor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Some students earn A-range grades, but comments , and harshly graded work.

Online and online reviews stressing discussion rubrics and in-person reviews stressing exams and attendance.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

16/100

Students repeatedly , and simple history content made harder than expected.

Online reviews emphasize dense lectures and frustrating assignments, while and difficult tests.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

32/100

, but many in-person comments describe strict absence, tardiness, and behavior rules.

Online reviews include both mandatory and nonmandatory attendance, while in-person reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Most students strongly recommend taking another professor because of , and stressful lectures.

Both formats are negative, though the online reviews are more recent and especially direct about avoiding her.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

, and difficult even when they try hard.

Format shift

Online comments focus on harsh discussion and assignment rubrics, while and few graded items.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

The class requires , and test preparation.

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussions and papers, while , and exams.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most comments describe unclear teaching, dry lectures, low empathy, and poor support despite a few students respecting her knowledge.

Format shift

Online reviews say she teaches little and gives weak feedback, while and poor question support.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

, and graded-by-few-things patterns more than balanced projects.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, tests, discussions, and papers, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews also skew negative, with , and frequent complaints about tone and support.

Main concern

Students say the class is difficult, dry, and often discouraging.

What students said

“Absolutely the .”
HIST300
“To pass her class you will have to study on your own.”
HIST300

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are strongly negative, with , and little flexibility on late work.

Main concern

Students say and specific even when they put in strong effort.

What students said

“ because she goes off on her very specific rubric that you have to follow to a tee.”
HIST300
“Doing all of your work to the MID grade.”
HIST300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as hard and sometimes disconnected from materials, but reviews .

Hard ExamsRandom Test QuestionsTake-Home Exams MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

38/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring rules.

Hard ExamsTake-Home Exams MentionedTests Not Matching Materials
“ so , and I still got D's on the exams.”
HIST307
“ book/powerpoint.”
HIST300

Online

Online reviews mention random quizzes and tests, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or other proctoring rules.

Random Quiz QuestionsTest HeavyNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“the questions on the quizzes and ”
HIST300
“ .”
HIST300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ but this person they are simply bad.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“she doesn't teach you much of anything and the .”

⚖️

10/100

“No advice to pass because .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“ this professor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She likes just to lecture not answering any question.
  • To pass her class you will have to study on your own.
  • Book taught you completely different material than what was in her PowerPoints.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class was the hardest class I have ever taken in my life and the hardest grade I have ever earned.
  • .
  • She grades tough and when a student asks questions she talks down at them.

Theme 3

🧭 About Course Advice

  • .
  • Stay away and save your gpa by taking someone else.
  • if taking for credit

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

138

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 reviews across many years, with , and teaching style.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 519
3 out of 524
2 out of 535
1 out of 545

Course coverage

HIST30028 reviews
HIST30710 reviews
HIST3057 reviews
HIS3073 reviews
HIST300WESTCIV2 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 2 · A- 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B- 2

C range

4

C 3 · C- 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Rather not say 5