AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Tanja L. Sacco

TRIG330 · MATH400 · MATH333 · MATH25 · CALC400 · MATH370PRCAL · MATH300 · MATH370 · MATH342 · MATH32 · MATH120 · MATH373 · MATH100 · MATH340 · 103 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
72.09%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you want a supportive math professor and are willing to keep up with .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear gradingCaring supportExtra creditHomework-heavyStrong lectures
  • Most students praise her as , and willing to help.
  • Grades are often attainable because of , and dropped scores.
  • The main risk is workload, especially in some online and higher math sections.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

An A is very realistic for students who complete homework, use reviews, and , but it is not effortless.

Online reviews show doable A grades with consistent work, while , dropped scores, and study-guide-aligned exams.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Math content can be challenging, but , and support make it easier for many students.

Online courses can feel workload-heavy without live meetings, while and direct help.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

and showing up matter, though some students report flexibility.

Online reviews are mixed on attendance, while and participation.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students recommend her because , and gives many chances to succeed.

Both formats are positive, but while online reviews depend more on videos and self-pacing.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

, and exams similar to reviews make grading feel generous when students do the work.

Format shift

and , while in-person reviews add dropped quizzes, note cards, and study-guide-matched exams.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload is steady and sometimes heavy, but many students say it is manageable with planning.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly videos, quizzes, and homework, while , and attendance.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Most students describe her as , and effective at making math understandable.

Format shift

Online reviews praise responsiveness and helpful videos, while , and office-hour support.

Assessment method

Balanced

56/100

Grades appear to , and participation rather than relying only on exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention homework, reviews, quizzes, midterms, and finals, while , and study guides.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are strongly positive overall, with , and exams that often match study guides.

Main concern

and , and frequent quizzes.

What students said

“Her study guides are EXACTLY like the test.”
MATH400
“Her teaching style is very easy to understand.”
TRIG330

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive, with , and doable grades, though some students find the workload heavy.

Main concern

The main and limited live instruction in some sections.

What students said

“No one should earn less than an A if they put in the effort.”
MATH300
“ if you have questions and she grades very clearly.”
MATH373

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally student-friendly because reviews often match tests and or dropped scores reduce risk.

Study Guides Match ExamsExtra CreditDropped ScoresNote Card Mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

cards, open-note group quizzes, and dropped scores, but do not clearly prove proctoring rules.

Study Guides Match ExamsSingle-Sided Note CardOpen Notes Group QuizzesDropped Lowest Score
“The study guide matches the types of .”
MATH120
“ .”
MATH400

Online

, and similar review tests, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Review Tests Similar To ExamsWeekly QuizzesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“the review tests and and exams.”
MATH300
“The assignments and ”
MATH340

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“No one should earn less than an A if they put in the effort.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Her teaching style is very easy to understand.”

📈 Grade Opportunity

84/100

“Lots of extra-credit opportunities.”

❤️ Student Support

88/100

“ and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very thorough in her lectures and will stop to answer questions.
  • Professor Sacco, has the ability to make math easy to understand.
  • ! Puts a lot of work into teaching, prepared for class, organized and !

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy class but you learn lots of calculus!
  • Great teacher!! Easiest A of my life.
  • There is a lot of homework but she gives plenty of time during the week to complete it

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Professor Tanja was one of the most caring and respectful professors I've ever had
  • and easy to reach.
  • Super friendly and willing to help.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

103

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 reviews across many years and formats, with .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 578
4 out of 59
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 59

Course coverage

MATH3739 reviews
MATH3708 reviews
MATH1007 reviews
MATH3406 reviews
MATH3004 reviews
Show 9 more courses
MATH4004 reviews
MATH3423 reviews
MATH1202 reviews
MATH322 reviews
CALC4001 review
MATH251 review
math3331 review
MATH370PRCAL1 review
TRIG3301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

47 reported outcomes

A range

28

A+ 13 · A 14 · A- 1

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 4