AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Peter Kiteck

STAT300 · MATH300 · MATH370 · MATH372 · STATS300 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

unless you can teach yourself the material and tolerate a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesSelf-teaching requiredTest heavyHeavy homeworkPoor communication
  • Students repeatedly and the textbook.
  • Grades can be possible through , but the effort cost is high.
  • Online and structure, and limited teaching value.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Some students earned A grades, but comments say it often required self-teaching, heavy homework, studying, cheat sheets, and surviving exams.

Online reviews include both an F and an A but are highly negative, while effort.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The math and statistics content becomes harder because , and often require independent learning.

Both formats describe challenging learning conditions, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

as mandatory, and one says it is required even though lectures do not help.

Online and , though some older in-person reviews list it as not mandatory or not provided.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Most direct recommendation comments warn students not to take him because of , and difficult exams.

Both online , and in-person reviews are also mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

He may give partial credit, drop a test, or allow cheat sheets, but , and withdrawals.

Format shift

Online and pacing, while in-person reviews show some leniency tools but .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and self-teaching.

Format shift

Both formats show heavy workload, with online reviews adding late lecture releases and assignment access problems.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Students often say he is nice but , and leaves them to learn alone.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on communication failures, while and self-teaching.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

The course is strongly exam and quiz driven, with , and homework used for preparation.

Format shift

Online and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with students because , and exam focused.

Main concern

Students often describe mandatory attendance with little learning value and .

What students said

“Had to have tutor teach me everything.”
MATH372
“Attendance is .”
MATH372
“You will have to spend the majority of your free time teaching yourself.”
MATH370

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are very negative, citing , and disrespectful planning.

Main concern

Students report , and .

What students said

“This class was impossible to pass.”
STAT300
“lectures wouldn't be released until 2 hours before the .”
STAT300
“His combination of atrocious planning and absolute lack of communication skills”
MATH372

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence varies because some reviews mention cheat sheets, open book, or dropped tests, while , and .

Test HeavyQuizzesIn-Person ExamsOnline ExamsCheat Sheets Sometimes AllowedLowest Test Dropped Sometimes

Assessment risk

Varies

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention in-person , and cheat sheets, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

In-Person ExamsOnline ExamsFour Exams And FinalCheat Sheets AllowedLowest Test Dropped
“We would have in person exams and .”
STAT300
“He has 4 exams and a final and of the semester.”
STATS300
“He allows cheat sheets so make them amazing because the .”
STATS300

Online

Online reviews mention tests and quizzes but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home rules.

Test HeavyQuizzes
“don't forget his disregard for the and quizzes!”
MATH372
“Lots of ”
STAT300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You will have to spend the majority of your free time teaching yourself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and ; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“ .”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

8/100

“ .”

🧪

88/100

“The class was pretty challenging at times, but , which is nice.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • .
  • When students asked for .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I scored 100-90 on homework but had a very low C due to the exams.
  • If you can demonstrate partial steps or any level of .
  • If you study well and pay attention, passing with an A isn't hard.

Theme 3

🧪

  • Lots of
  • problems.
  • Expect quite a bit of .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-three reviews across many years show repeated, detailed , and communication, with only limited positive exceptions.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 54
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 510

Course coverage

STAT3009 reviews
MATH3724 reviews
STATS3004 reviews
MATH3002 reviews
MATH3702 reviews
Show 2 more courses
1201 review
138121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1