AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Sandro Fusco

M340 · MATH370 · MATH342 · MATH120 · MATH340 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
21/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you can teach yourself math and mainly need credit.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest heavyHard to follow lecturesLots of homeworkTough gradingLow support
  • Students repeatedly say lectures are and support is weak.
  • Online reviews mention heavy platform-based work and poor recorded lectures.
  • A few students passed or earned high grades, but most positive outcomes required prior knowledge or heavy self-teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Some students earned A grades, but comments show that passing often depends on self-teaching, prior knowledge, or heavy work.

Online evidence includes one easy pass claim, while in and low grades.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The math content feels harder because and students often need to relearn material alone.

Online difficulty comes from weak recorded instruction, while in person difficulty comes from and test-heavy pacing.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

35/100

, but several in person classes mark it as mandatory and important.

Online reviews vary between mandatory and not mandatory, while most in as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students warn against taking him because instruction, communication, and .

Both formats are mostly negative, with online reviews especially critical of recorded lectures and communication.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

, and grades concentrated around C, F, and withdrawal despite a few A outcomes.

Format shift

Online reviews mention few graded items and exams, while in and poor pass expectations.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Multiple reviews mention lots of , and .

Format shift

Online workload is platform-heavy, while in person , and exams.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Comments consistently criticize unclear explanations, weak communication, and hard-to-follow lectures.

Format shift

Online students cite poor recordings and little contact, while in person students cite and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

, and few graded items more than project or discussion work.

Format shift

Online reviews explicitly mention MyMathLab exams, while in person reviews repeatedly tag the class as test heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person students report , and uneven support.

Main concern

Lectures are and .

What students said

“his lectures were difficult to follow”
MATH340
“ !”
MATH342
“I had to reteach myself a lot of things”
M340

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students describe poor recorded lectures, heavy MyMathLab work, and limited communication.

Main concern

You may need to learn most material independently.

What students said

“No communication throughout the entire semester unless it was to give the .”
MATH340
“Your only source of learning the material are from recorded lectures”
MATH340
“The lectures aren't interesting, and when he handwrites, it's hard to read.”
MATH370

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

one in person review saying notes and close study guides helped.

Test HeavyFew Graded ItemsStudy GuidesNotes Allowed In One Review

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews mention tests, quizzes, notes on tests, and study guides, but do not clearly prove closed-book or .

TestsStudy GuidesNotes AllowedTest Heavy
“ and study guides are almost identical to the test.”
MATH120
“study ”
MATH340

Online

and , but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, or Lockdown Browser policies.

MyMathLab ExamsExam PasscodeTest Heavy
“ and exams (4) are on this platform.”
MATH340
“unless it was to give the .”
MATH340

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Doesnt really give a .”

⚖️

35/100

“ and exams (4) are on this platform.”

👍 Recommendation Level

25/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his lectures were difficult to follow
  • no help just work
  • The lectures aren't interesting, and when he handwrites, it's hard to read.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class was so difficult for me
  • Put the work in and you'll be ok.
  • and exams (4) are on this platform.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Risk

  • I failed in my personal opinion due to the lack of personal teaching.
  • I had to reteach myself a lot of things
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews across several years give useful patterns, but the sample is small and opinions vary by course.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH3403 reviews
MATH3702 reviews
M3401 review
MATH1201 review
MATH3421 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1