AI Rate Professor

History

Edward Hashima

HIST300 · HIS310 · USHISTORY · HIST483 · HIST325 · HIST310 · HISTORY325 · HST318 · HISTORY310 · HISTORY · HIST311 · 174 lifetime ratings

AI rating
63/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
52.27%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Take him if you like history, writing, and critical thinking, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderLecture heavyExtra creditClear rubricsSlow grading
  • Students often praise his knowledge, lectures, and critical thinking focus.
  • Grades can be earned with steady writing, reading, and attention to rubrics, but many students call him a tough or .
  • Online reviews are more critical about access, feedback, and , while .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is realistic with , and , but many students say the grading is strict.

Online evidence includes both open-book and tough-grading comments, while but .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The content is not usually described as conceptually impossible, but , and specific detail.

Online courses rely heavily on discussions, quizzes, and papers, while , and participation.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

as mandatory or strongly useful, though some sections appear optional.

Online attendance rules vary by section, while as expected or important.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

57/100

Students recommend him when they value lectures and learning, but , and heavy writing.

Online recommendation is more divided because access and grading delays are common complaints, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

and clear rubrics help, but repeated comments call him a tough or .

Format shift

Online reviews mention tough grading with limited feedback, while grading.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Students repeatedly mention , and weekly work.

Format shift

Online workload is mostly discussions, lectures, quizzes, and papers, while , and participation.

Teaching experience

Good

64/100

He is often described as knowledgeable and engaging, but , and disorganization limit the experience.

Format shift

In-person teaching is viewed more favorably, while online teaching , and response time.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Assessment appears , and essay exams depending on section.

Format shift

Online sections lean toward discussions, quizzes, and papers, while and writing assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are also mixed but stronger recently, with students praising lectures, knowledge, and while .

Main concern

Students must keep up with , and .

What students said

“He's lenient with late work and assigns enough opportunities to boost your grade.”
HIST310
“ .”
HIST310
“ .”
HIST310

Remote format

Online

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with some students praising structure and open-book work while , and heavy writing.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Everything is open book.”
HIST311
“ discussion or a writing assignment, offers about 3 assignments.”
310
“This class is very difficult to manage.”
HIST310

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam format varies by section, with some online open-book or no-test formats and .

Open Book Online WorkNo Final Exam In Some SectionsEssay ExamsQuizzesWriting Assignments

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and writing assignments, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Essay ExamsIn-Class EssaysWriting AssignmentsNo Final Exam In One Section
“ .”
HISTORY
“There are 3 exams and 4 assignments.”
HIST310
“There is .”
HIST310

Online

and also mention quizzes, exams, discussions, and papers, but they do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring rules.

Open BookQuizzesWriting AssignmentsDiscussion Posts
“Everything is open book.”
HIST311
“3 or 4 total exams. 2 total writing assignments.”
HIST311
“He allows 2 or 3 attempts for each quiz and the rest of the class are discussions.”
HIS310

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor is very easy, and a guaranteed A. There are lots of discussion posts and writing assignments, but and as long as you follow them .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

64/100

“Really made history fun and engaging.”

⚖️

38/100

“Very tough grader and .”

📚 Workload Reality

34/100

“There are lots of discussion posts and writing assignments, but and as long as you follow them .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is an engaging lecturer who consistently shares valuable info.
  • I'm not a history major but I took a few of Professor Hashima's history classes.
  • Hashima is a really great teacher.
  • Lectures are all over the place (jumps in between slides) and you can't get any good notes from his lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He is definitely a .
  • This class can be an easy A if yo simply do all the work, I personally did not think he was difficult.
  • For an A, look elswhere
  • He's lenient with late work and assigns enough opportunities to boost your grade.

Theme 3

⏳

  • and a .
  • This class is very difficult to manage.
  • He does not grade things until the end of the semester which makes it hard for people to know how their doing in the class.
  • Everything is laid out on canvas and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

174

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 reviews across many years and formats, with repeated , and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 557
4 out of 530
3 out of 529
2 out of 537
1 out of 521

Course coverage

HIST31018 reviews
HIS31011 reviews
HIST3116 reviews
HIST4835 reviews
HIST3252 reviews
Show 7 more courses
HISTORY2 reviews
3101 review
HIST3001 review
HISTORY3101 review
HISTORY3251 review
HST3181 review
USHISTORY1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 4 · A 14 · A- 1

B range

15

B+ 3 · B 12

C range

2

C 2

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

5

Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 2