AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Dane Fleshman

PRECALC370 · MATH401 · MATH110 · MATH330 · MATH370 · M400 · PRECALCULUS370 · MATH410 · MATH420 · PRECAL10202 · PRECAL370 · STATS300 · 36 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
63.89%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take him if you can self-study and value forgiving grading, but if and fast communication.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLenient gradingLots of homeworkClear but inconsistent teachingHard to reachSelf-study friendly
  • Grades are often forgiving because students mention , and .
  • Teaching quality is uneven, with clear and caring reviews balanced by repeated complaints about disorganization, handwriting, and lecture mistakes.
  • Online sections look more manageable for independent students, while and term.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

A grades are common because reviews repeatedly mention generous grading, , and manageable work.

Online evidence points to manageable work, while in-person evidence adds stronger claims about curves, , and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

The math content can be abstract or challenging, but exams and .

Online students describe understandable materials, while and self-study.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Online sections are attendance-free, but as mandatory.

, while in-person attendance varies and is often marked mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

and he is caring, but many hesitate because lectures can be disorganized and .

Online reviews are more consistently recommendable for independent students, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Grading is often forgiving through curves, , partial credit, repeated exam attempts, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention easy tests and clear criteria, while in-person reviews provide stronger evidence of curves, , and .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload is often described as lots of , and exams, but several students still call it manageable.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize manageable but frequent work, while in-person .

Teaching experience

Good

62/100

He can be caring and clear, but repeated comments about disorganization, poor handwriting, soft speaking, and mistakes lower the teaching score.

Format shift

Online teaching appears steadier for self-paced students, while and stronger complaints.

Assessment method

Balanced

66/100

Grades appear to come from a mix of , and exams, with several reviews mentioning test-heavy courses.

Format shift

Online reviews mention homework, quizzes, and exams, while in-person , and partial credit.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are highly mixed, with many students praising fairness and care while others report and poor organization.

Main concern

Lecture clarity and organization are inconsistent.

What students said

“Be prepared to learn on your own.”
MATH401
“Quizzes and in class, just different numbers.”
MATH420
“unfortunately he is an , and unclear professor.”
MATH110

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly positive for independent students because work is manageable and , but communication is weak.

Main concern

He may be hard to reach and slow to grade.

What students said

“He kinda just posts materials once a week and calls it a day.”
MATH410
“A lot of , and exams however they are manageable.”
MATH420
“The class is seriously asynchronous.”
MATH420

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often described as manageable or forgiving, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

Easy ExamsMultiple AttemptsTake-Home ExamsCurved TestsQuizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, partial credit, and some take-home exams, but they do not prove a single consistent policy.

Multiple AttemptsTake-Home ExamsCurved TestsPartial CreditEasy Exams
“the exams allowed you to have 3 attempts”
MATH401
“2 in class exams, 2 take home exams, 7 quizzes.”
MATH410
“5 tests total and .”
PRECAL10202

Online

, and exams, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Easy TestsQuizzesExams
“the assignments, quizzes, and .”
MATH410
“A lot of , and exams however they are manageable.”
MATH420

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If your own!”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“ and easy to follow.”

📈 Grade Value

82/100

“ .”

⚠️ Organization Risk

45/100

“Very disorganized professor. All the exam and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and directly to the point.
  • Every lecture is like trying to decipher a code.
  • Messy handwriting, uninspired and slow lectures, and does not communicate with students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Quizzes and in class, just different numbers.
  • Easy A 4 sure
  • He is pretty fair on partial credit and has a few points if .

Theme 3

💬 About Support & Communication

  • and pushes back due dates if he sees that students are struggling or potentially falling behind.
  • The professor sometimes doesn't , and if so, .
  • He will stay long hours after class if you need help, and as much detail as you wish.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

36

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 37 reviews across many years and courses, with detailed and repeated themes despite polarized opinions.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 57
3 out of 56
2 out of 55
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH4107 reviews
MATH3706 reviews
MATH4016 reviews
MATH4206 reviews
MATH1104 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH3302 reviews
M4001 review
PRECAL102021 review
PRECAL3701 review
PRECALC3701 review
PRECALCULUS3701 review
STATS3001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

23

A+ 5 · A 17 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 5