AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lisa Sowinski

STAT310 · MATH370 · MATH372 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you can handle a and do not need a relaxed classroom.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerClear LecturesTest HeavyTough GraderExtra CreditAttendance Pressure
  • Students describe strong teaching and .
  • The course is test-heavy, lecture-heavy, and requires steady work.
  • Recommendation is weak because some students report .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Students earned As, but , and a need to stay organized.

Online evidence points to self-paced effort, while but .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Statistics and math content are challenging because lectures are dense and exams are frequent.

Online courses are paced by videos and homework, while and lecture dependent.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

In-person reviews mark attendance as mandatory, while .

, but in-person attendance is consistently mandatory or strongly needed.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Students respect her teaching, but and conduct complaints make the recommendation conditional.

Online evidence is more positive, while and includes the strongest negative review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

46/100

and , but students still describe her as a tough and particular grader.

Format shift

and , while online reviews emphasize clear criteria but many exams.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload includes MyLab , and dense lectures.

Format shift

Online workload is heavy through videos, homework, quizzes, and exams, while and .

Teaching experience

Average

68/100

She can teach clearly and knows the material, but one severe hostile-classroom review lowers the score.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is positive, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews repeatedly mention quizzes, exams, and finals as central parts of the course.

Format shift

Both formats are exam-heavy, with online reviews listing many exams and and frequent exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show helpful exam support and , but , and one severe conduct complaint.

Main concern

The main concern is strict classroom expectations and inconsistent student comfort.

What students said

“She is a .”
STAT310
“Creates hostile and uncomfortable classroom environments”
MATH372

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews praise clear lectures and flexible pacing, but both describe a and .

Main concern

Online students must keep up with , and many exams.

What students said

“Lecture videos are lengthy so prepare accordingly.”
MATH370
“ stretch, but they are not timed when taught online.”
MATH370

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequent and demanding, but some policies like formula sheets, notes on the final, and .

Frequent ExamsWeekly QuizzesFormula Sheet AllowedNotes Allowed On FinalUntimed Online Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

61/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

formula sheet, and notes on the final, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules.

Weekly QuizzesExams Every Other WeekFormula Sheet AllowedNotes Allowed On Final
“Expect and exams every other week (1 formula sheet is allowed).”
STAT310
“Can use notes for the .”
STAT310

Online

Online reviews mention many exams and untimed tests, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Untimed Online TestsFive ExamsFinal ExamSix Quizzes
“5 exams worth 100pts and a .”
MATH370
“ stretch, but they are not timed when taught online.”
MATH370

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You really get out what you put into this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom fit. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“She is a great teacher who is knowledgeable and wants you to succeed.”

📝

82/100

“5 exams worth 100pts and a .”

⚖️

46/100

“She is a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Sowinski has great lectures and teaches in a and quizzes.
  • She is a great teacher who is knowledgeable and wants you to succeed.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • STAT310 is a hard 4 unit class!
  • Lots of (thank god).
  • stretch, but they are not timed when taught online.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Fit

  • Lecture-densed class.
  • Creates hostile and uncomfortable classroom environments
  • This lady has a special place in my heart but

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

46/100

Evidence confidence

Only 5 reviews are available, and opinions are split across formats and years.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH3702 reviews
STAT3102 reviews
MATH3721 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1