AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Knarik Manukyan

STAT300 · MLSK10A · MLSK7B · MATH015 · MATH32 · MATH342 · EDUC18 · MATH125 · MATH375 · MATH120 · MATH100 · MATH661 · 59 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
88%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want a and are willing to keep up with homework and attendance.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring math teacherClear explanationsStudy guides helpDrops lowest scoresHomework-heavy
  • Students overwhelmingly describe her as , and willing to help inside and outside class.
  • Grades are very reachable for , and use study guides, but the course is not effortless.
  • Online reviews are more self-study and workload-heavy, while .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

An A is very realistic if students attend and because reviews mention study guides, dropped scores, , and exams matching practice.

Online students still report heavy MyLab work, while a .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Math can still be challenging, but and study guides make the material much easier to follow.

Online sections feel more self-taught, while as clear and beginner-friendly.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

success, especially in in-person math classes.

Online reviews are mostly non-mandatory, but the .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and .

, while online recommendations remain positive but more workload-dependent.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

because students mention dropped exams, dropped quizzes, dropped homework, study guides, , and fair exams.

Format shift

Online reviews clearly mention dropped scores, and , and fair exam preparation.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload is steady and sometimes heavy, with daily or , and exams.

Format shift

Online workload feels heavier because of MyLab and self-study, while but usually framed as useful practice.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Teaching is excellent overall because students repeatedly describe her as , and helpful.

Format shift

, while online reviews are positive but less uniformly strong.

Assessment method

Balanced

64/100

Assessment blends homework, quizzes, exams, study guides, and occasional group or .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize MyLab homework plus quizzes and exams, while , and study guides.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are strongly positive, with repeated praise for , and supportive grading policies.

Main concern

The , and exams.

What students said

“She taught so clearly and organized.”
math375
“Amazing professor. She really cares about her students success.”
MATH120
“ .”
MATH100

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are positive overall but warn that MyLab, quizzes, exams, and and heavy.

Main concern

The main concern is heavy MyLab work and needing outside resources in online sections.

What students said

“Overall a great and caring professor but just the workload is a bit heavy.”
MATH342
“I feel like I am learning things on my own.”
MATH342
“ and some of your lowest homeworks.”
MATH342

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is student-friendly because reviews repeatedly mention study guides, exam reviews, dropped scores, and practice that reflects exams, but proctoring and .

Dropped Lowest ExamDropped Lowest QuizStudy GuidesExam ReviewsNote Card Mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, note cards, pop quizzes, and occasional take-home quizzes, but they do not clearly prove standard proctoring or closed-book rules.

Study GuidesDropped Lowest ExamNote Card MentionedPop QuizzesSome Take-Home Quizzes
“ and quiz score and provides a study guide”
math375
“ but ”
MATH125
“a card”
MATH125

Online

, and dropped lowest scores, but they do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, take-home, or proctoring rules.

Dropped Lowest TestDropped Lowest QuizExam HeavyHomework Reflects Exams
“ and quiz”
MATH342
“ so just make .”
MATH342

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A REAL gem here at ARC (as far as math teachers go.)”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Her lectures are so clear and thorough that you don't even need the textbook”

👍 Recommendation Rate

91/100

“ !!”

⚖️

78/100

“ and some of your lowest homeworks.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She taught so clearly and organized.
  • She has a talent for breaking down complex concepts into manageable parts
  • Makes math easy and understandable for you.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Homework and .
  • Complete the study guide and you will pass.
  • and you'll have a good chance of getting a good grade !!

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Amazing professor. She really cares about her students success.
  • She is such a sweetheart and will stop mid lecture to answer any questions
  • and and understanding.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

59

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 50 reviews with recent and older evidence, and the positive teaching pattern is highly consistent despite some workload complaints.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 542
4 out of 510
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH12023 reviews
MATH1006 reviews
math3756 reviews
MATH1253 reviews
MATH3423 reviews
Show 7 more courses
STAT3003 reviews
EDUC181 review
MATH0151 review
MATH321 review
MATH6611 review
MLSK10A1 review
MLSK7B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

28 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 7 · A 8

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

4

C+ 2 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Fail 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1