AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Gegham Melkonyan

MATH400 · STAT300 · MATH25 · MATH401 · MATH379 · MATH330 · MATH370 · ECON384 · MATH32AND25 · PRECAL · MATH410 · MATH120 · MATH100 · 43 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you will attend lectures and do the homework, but be cautious with online sections.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear math explanationsHeavy homeworkExtra creditSlow gradingOnline risk
  • In-person reviews are mostly strong and .
  • Recent online reviews are sharply , and .
  • Grades can be high, but and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

73/100

and , but students repeatedly say you must attend, do homework, and tolerate slow grade feedback.

, while recent online evidence makes the A feel less predictable.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

He often makes math understandable, but fast summer pacing, homework volume, and .

and manageable, while online reviews describe more confusion and stress.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Many in-person sections mark attendance as mandatory, while .

and more flexible online, based on the submitted format counts.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

, but recent online reviews create a major warning.

Recommendation is high for in-person classes and much weaker for recent online classes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and , but late grades, missing feedback, and few graded items reduce confidence.

Format shift

and fair grading more often, while online reviews report opaque or .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and time pressure.

Format shift

Both formats show workload, but online reviews describe it as more stressful and less supported.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

He is often praised as clear and , but recent online reviews describe poor communication and weak course management.

Format shift

In-person teaching quality is strong, while recent online teaching quality is the main weakness.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Grades , and occasional .

Format shift

and quizzes, while online evidence mentions exams, final exams, homework, and activities.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students usually describe him as , and supportive, especially for math-anxious students.

Main concern

Students still mention lots of , and .

What students said

“The professor genuinely cares that everyone understood and .”
STAT300
“Lots of homework, but if you do all the .”
MATH400
“ !”
MATH400

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are highly split, with older praise but several , and stressful course management.

Main concern

, and poor Canvas management.

What students said

“ .”
STAT300
“ .”
MATH400
“A true gem!”
MATH400

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mixed, with some student-friendly quizzes and but and unclear online score reporting.

Exams And FinalTake-Home QuizzesExtra CreditUnclear Online Grading

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews , and , but do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring rules.

Take-Home QuizzesExams Similar To HomeworkExtra Credit
“ ”
MATH120
“ and nothing tricky.”
STAT300

Online

Online reviews mention exams and a final, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, or proctoring policy.

Exams And FinalUnclear Grade Release
“lots of HW, 3 exams, 1 final, and lil EC”
MATH400
“None of the graded.”
MATH410

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 44 reviews, separating online and , and format risk; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“His lectures were amazing he helped me catch up and pass with an A.”

⚖️

58/100

“He grades last min and .”

📚 Workload

34/100

“Assigns 6+ hrs of HW due in 3 days.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He doesnt expect you to .
  • Great teacher who genuinely cares about his students.
  • took him over the summer and . unfortunately he was not good at all

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • a lot of and .
  • !
  • You will have to put in the work to earn a good grade

Theme 3

💻 About Online Sections

  • He does not know how to work Canvas, which is alarming since this was an online course.
  • Doesn't grade anything and will give you a grade based on how he feels like at the moment.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

44

Recent reviews read by the AI

43

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

There are 44 reviews across many years and courses, with a and recent online complaints.

Inside 44 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 529
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH12013 reviews
STAT3007 reviews
MATH4006 reviews
MATH3704 reviews
MATH1003 reviews
Show 8 more courses
MATH252 reviews
MATH4102 reviews
PRECAL2 reviews
ECON3841 review
MATH32AND251 review
MATH3301 review
MATH3791 review
MATH4011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

23 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 8 · A 9

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 4