AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Annmarie Beasley

ANTHRO310 · ANTH320 · ANTH310 · ANTH300 · ANTH341 · ANTHR300 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you want a demanding anthropology class and , and frequent assessment pressure.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy reading loadTough graderTest heavyCaring but demandingMixed experience
  • Recent reviews are strongly negative and , and .
  • Older reviews , and caring attitude.
  • Students who do well usually read heavily, follow instructions closely, and keep up every week.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Grades can be high, but comments repeatedly say students must work hard, read a lot, and follow instructions closely to earn them.

Online reviews include recent low-grade and withdrawal warnings, while but still call them hard-earned.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The content is not always conceptually impossible, but the , and tests make the course feel challenging.

Online students emphasize workload and unclear material flow, while , and detailed tests.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

38/100

Attendance is often marked mandatory or important, though some .

Online attendance evidence varies by review, while and notes are important.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

The recommendation signal is split, but recent comments if possible.

Online recommendation is , while in-person reviews include both strong praise and strong avoidance.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Many comments directly call her a tough or clear criteria.

Format shift

Both formats mention tough grading, with online reviews especially negative in recent comments.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and more work than expected.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize readings, Canvas materials, quizzes, and tests, while , and papers.

Teaching experience

Poor

44/100

Her teaching is polarizing, with older praise for caring and strong lectures but recent complaints about course structure and workload.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is more negative and inconsistent, while and passion.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

, and reading-based work rather than only assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes and test-heavy grading, while , and lecture notes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are also mixed, with strong praise for lectures and passion but , and .

Main concern

The main concern is that earning a , and tolerance for .

What students said

“ if you can.”
ANTH341
“Hardest A I've had to work for.”
ANTH310
“Prof. Beasley was great. , and is really passionate about this subject.”
ANTH300

Remote format

Online

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are sharply mixed, with recent students , and .

Main concern

The main risk is a heavy online workload with and test-heavy structure.

What students said

“Save your self don't do it”
ANTH300
“Choose another professor if possible, She will make you work hard for a GE”
ANTH300
“Professor Beasley was awesome, all of her questions on the make it tricky”
ANTH310

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show frequent and specific tests or quizzes, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or strict proctoring.

Test HeavyWeekly QuizzesSpecific QuestionsPop QuizzesReading-Based Exams

Assessment risk

Varies

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

tests, and lecture-note dependence, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules.

Specific TestsPop QuizzesVocab TestsLecture Notes Matter
“Tests are 50% of your grade and questions are very specific.”
ANTH310
“ .”
ANTH320

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and , and concepts, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Weekly QuizzesTest HeavyReading-Based Tests
“based on lectures, articles, and textbook.”
ANTH341
“For the the chapters and know the concept and that was all”
ANTH310

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Choose another professor if possible, She will make you work hard for a GE”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

44/100

“She's a pretty solid professor! Smart and caring.”

⚖️

24/100

“She is such a !!”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“More work than the syllabus suggests.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Basically another english class
  • Tons of reading. Book work. Study and review before class.
  • There was a lot of reading involved, and quizzes and vocab tests. Definitely lots of work.

Theme 2

⚖️ About Grades

  • Hardest A I've had to work for.
  • She is a good professor but .
  • she is a and will act like her class is your major.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She covers all of the material in her lectures and provides clear instructions/criteria-- as long as you take good notes, you won't .
  • Prof. Beasley is a great educator. She is very passionate about the subject and it shows in her lectures.
  • The plot of and they get convoluted, does not grade timely.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The 28 reviews span many years and formats, with enough recent detail to show a real negative shift despite older positive reviews.

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 55
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 511

Course coverage

ANTH30011 reviews
ANTH3107 reviews
ANTH3415 reviews
ANTH3203 reviews
ANTHR3001 review
Show 1 more courses
ANTHRO3101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 2 · A 6 · A- 3

B range

4

B 3 · B- 1

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 1 · C- 2

D range

1

D+ 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Rather not say 2