AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Svetlana Anishchenko

MATH25 · MATH32 · II493 · MATH100 · STATS300 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

unless you are ready for , and outside study support.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots Of HomeworkHard TestsMandatory AttendanceUnclear ExplanationsStrict Classroom
  • Most , and heavy homework.
  • One positive review says and .
  • , and several students say skipping hurts performance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

and , but students repeatedly report hard tests, lots of homework, and grades dropping from group work.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The content , and homework that does not always match lectures.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

, and one tag says students will not pass if .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students would not recommend her because the , and test-heavy.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Reviews , and only limited offset from extra credit.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Many reviews explicitly mention lots of , and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Students often describe her explanations as unclear, though a minority say she is caring and helpful outside class.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

Assessment includes homework, quizzes, group work, tests, and study guides, with .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly negative, citing unclear explanations, lots of , and .

Main concern

Students often say the workload and .

What students said

“Very hard to understand, heavy accent, tons of hmwk, and and confusing.”
MATH32
“ and it just makes you so confused.”
STATS300
“Just show up and you'll pass.”
MATH100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews say tests and quizzes are hard, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or .

Hard TestsQuizzesMultiple Choice TestsPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and multiple choice tests, but exact exam policy is not clearly proven.

Hard TestsQuizzesMultiple Choice Tests
“ and confusing.”
MATH32
“ and .”
STATS300
“ .”
II493

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very hard to understand, heavy accent, tons of hmwk, and and confusing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“ and it just makes you so confused.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“Very hard to understand, heavy accent, tons of hmwk, and and confusing.”

⚖️ Grade Fairness

28/100

“y grade also dropped drastically because of the group work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Tough to understand .
  • Wonderful teacher, very helpful, kind and soft spoken.
  • She cares a lot about her students, will even come early to class or stay after to provide extra help.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • her tests and .
  • Just show up and you'll pass.
  • Different lectures in class then the hmwk.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of homework
  • tons of hmwk
  • and there are quizzes online as well.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

and test complaints, but several are old and some details vary by course.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH1002 reviews
MATH322 reviews
STATS3002 reviews
II4931 review
MATH251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1