AI Rate Professor

Legal Assisting

Christine Thiltgen

CONTRACTS · TORTS · INTRO300 · CIVLIT · LA314 · LEGAL300 · LA300 · TORTSINTRO · LA310 · LA300314 · INTRO · LAW300 · LAWLAW · 56 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Only take Christine Thiltgen if and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized LecturesSelf-Teaching RequiredHard TestsSlow FeedbackMixed Personality
  • Many students say lectures go off topic and .
  • Grades and as .
  • A and fair, but the if possible.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Some students passed easily, but , and a need to rely heavily on the textbook.

Online evidence is negative and self-taught, while and shows inconsistent but .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The legal content may be manageable, but , and word-for-word questions make the course feel harder.

Online comments stress self-teaching, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

24/100

, and one says she locked the door at the start of class.

, while in-person comments include mandatory meetings and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

because they describe poor organization, weak teaching, and unfair or .

Both formats lean negative, with online reviews focused on lack of instruction and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

, and test answers that feel arbitrary.

Format shift

Online comments mention late grading and exams, while inconsistent grading.

Workload

Heavy

36/100

The workload , and tests that require close textbook study.

Format shift

and weekly exams, while in-person reviews repeatedly say students must read the book carefully.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

The dominant pattern is disorganized, off-topic teaching with .

Format shift

Online reviews say she does not teach enough, while and poor organization.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Comments emphasize quizzes, pop quizzes, chapter exams, tests, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention D2L exams, while and difficult tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but strongly skew toward complaints about disorganization, off-topic lectures, and hard or .

Main concern

The main risk is learning little in lecture while still facing tricky assessments.

What students said

“This professor is totally unorganized, easily distracted, & constantly veers off topic.”
LA300
“ .”
LA300

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are consistently negative and say students had to teach themselves with weak guidance.

Main concern

Students report poor teaching presence and .

What students said

“She simply doesn't teach.”
LA300
“You WILL be teaching yourself everything.”
LA300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe frequent and difficult exams or quizzes, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

D2L ExamsPop QuizzesWord-For-Word QuestionsTricky Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and word-for-word true-or-false questions, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules.

Pop QuizzesHard TestsWord-For-Word Questions
“Expect .”
LA300
“The if you're not good with WORD FOR WORD TRUE OR FALSE questions.”
LA300

Online

Online reviews mention D2L exams, a , and chapter exams, but .

D2L ExamsChapter ExamsFinal Exam
“A 14!”
LA300
“doesn't teach lesson until after the .”
LA300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor is totally unorganized, easily distracted, & constantly veers off topic.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“She simply doesn't teach.”

⚖️

22/100

“ because the answer could be right, but if she doesn't like that one, she'll mark it wrong.”

📚 Workload Reality

36/100

“Just go to class and read the book - stick with the Legal Assisting program - it gets better after this class!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This professor is totally unorganized, easily distracted, & constantly veers off topic.
  • , and she is NOT a litigator.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • The if you're not good with WORD FOR WORD TRUE OR FALSE questions.
  • This class can be easily passed, but don't expect to learn much.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and fair.
  • This professor is very personable, and makes classe extremely interesting by giving a lot of real examples from her experience.
  • Strict and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

56

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The review count is high, spans many years, and shows a consistent pattern of disorganization despite some positive outliers.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 55
3 out of 510
2 out of 516
1 out of 514

Course coverage

LA30032 reviews
CONTRACTS3 reviews
LA3143 reviews
INTRO2 reviews
LA3102 reviews
Show 8 more courses
CIVLIT1 review
INTRO3001 review
LA3003141 review
LAW3001 review
LAWLAW1 review
LEGAL3001 review
TORTS1 review
TORTSINTRO1 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1