AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Shahla Mokhtarzada

SOSC312 · SOCSC312 · SOC300 · SOC480 · SOC301 · SOC300AND301 · IS310 · IS312 · 226 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
46.15%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if and can handle strict rules and difficult exams.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerStrong lecturesStrict attendanceHard testsUnclear gradingPolarizing style
  • Students often call her lectures engaging, passionate, and memorable.
  • The biggest risks , and a confrontational classroom style.
  • Online reviews are weak overall, with two students describing poor organization and little support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

Some students earn high grades with notes, attendance, and , but many describe hard tests and .

Online has one easy-workload review, while in person evidence and difficult exams.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The sociology content is understandable for many students, but and detailed study.

Online confusion comes more from organization, while in person and strict lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

, and missing or leaving class can be punished.

In , while online evidence is too limited and mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

47/100

Students recommend her for powerful lectures, but because of , and harsh interactions.

In person reviews are polarized, while online reviews lean negative except for one SOC301 review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Students , and exams that feel hard or confusing.

Format shift

In person reviews provide most grading evidence, while online .

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Homework is often light, but exams, essays, readings, and .

Format shift

Online workload appears light in one review, while in person and note-taking.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Her lectures can be excellent, but the teaching and harsh classroom interactions.

Format shift

In person students praise lectures more often, while online students report weaker teaching support.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

, and a smaller number of papers or essays.

Format shift

Both formats mention exams or midterms, but in person .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person reviews praise her lectures and knowledge but , and strict classroom control.

Main concern

Students who miss class, dislike strict rules, or .

What students said

“Absolutely amazing lectures! I looked forward to her class.”
SOC300
“ .”
SOC300AND301

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are very mixed, with one strong positive review and two complaints about poor organization and lack of teaching.

Main concern

Online students may need to learn independently if the course shell or communication is weak.

What students said

“She did nothing to teach anyone, and .”
SOC300
“Barely any work just an essay and .”
SOC301

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

describing hard lecture-based tests and a few describing student-friendly features.

Hard Multiple-Choice TestsLecture-Based TestsNotes Allowed In Some ExamsNo Tests In One IS312 ReviewMidterms

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews often describe hard lecture-based tests, with one review saying notes were allowed except on the final and one saying there were no tests.

Hard TestsLecture-Based TestsNotes Allowed In Some ExamsNo Tests In One Course
“Tests are 75% lecture, 25% book.”
SOC300
“She lets you use her !”
SOC300

Online

Online reviews mention midterms and section exams, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

MidtermsSection Exams
“Barely any work just an essay and .”
SOC301

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's smart, funny, and a great sociologist, but very didactic in her teaching.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and ; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Absolutely amazing lectures! I looked forward to her class.”

🧪

45/100

“ and tricky.”

🚪

15/100

“Do not miss any classes or you will not pass.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and straightforward is her teaching style and it helps students follow along easily.
  • Her lectures are fascinating and definitely not boring!
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Pretty sure everyone will end up with a high grade if you do the .
  • The questions were graduate level, but her lectures & material is easy.
  • It seems like an A or B is not possible.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Fit

  • She likes to belittle people and embarrass them in front of class.
  • If you're in school to get good grades and not experience a myriad of !
  • Show her respect....and you'll get far.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

226

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The judgment is strong because 50 reviews over many years repeat the same split between excellent lectures and strict, difficult assessment.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 588
4 out of 559
3 out of 531
2 out of 531
1 out of 517

Course coverage

SOC30030 reviews
SOC3018 reviews
SOC4804 reviews
IS3122 reviews
SOC300AND3012 reviews
Show 4 more courses
3001 review
IS3101 review
SOCSC3121 review
SOSC3121 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

10

B+ 5 · B 5

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Not sure yet 5 · Not_Sure_Yet 1