AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Camille Leonhardt

HIST340 · HIST330 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
77.78%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you are willing to attend, read, and participate, especially if you want history taught with energy and care.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring TeacherParticipation MattersHeavy ReadingClear ExpectationsHistory Enthusiast
  • Most students praise her passion, clarity, and caring attitude.
  • The course is not a free A because , and group work matter.
  • Students who attend, read, and engage usually report strong outcomes, while transfer-only students may find the workload high.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Many students earned A-range grades, but the A , and staying ready for quizzes and tests.

Online evidence shows an A with helpful support, while but tied to participation and reading.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The content is manageable and often engaging, but , and group work add real effort.

The online review does not describe content difficulty much, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as mandatory or say skipping class will make passing difficult.

Online attendance evidence is unclear, while and participation.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

, and caring teaching, but not everyone likes the workload or strict participation.

Online evidence is positive but thin, while strong workload and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

64/100

Grades are described as fair and specific, but some students call her tough and .

Format shift

Online evidence mentions clear grading, while and .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The workload includes readings, , and participation, but students do not describe it as constant busy work.

Format shift

Online workload evidence is limited, while .

Teaching experience

Good

83/100

Students often describe her as , and able to make history interesting.

Format shift

Online and and teaching, though some in-person reviews criticize the style.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Assessment includes quizzes, tests, essays, group projects, presentations, participation, and class assignments.

Format shift

Online assessment evidence is unclear, while , writing, participation, and group work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive but consistently show that , and group work matter.

Main concern

Mandatory participation and detailed reading can make the class hard for students seeking a light transfer course.

What students said

“No busy work but you must show up to class for participation.”
HIST330
“ and quizzes hard.”
HIST330

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review is very positive and , and responsive.

Main concern

Online evidence is limited to one review.

What students said

“Being that the class was and helpful.”
HIST330

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, tests, and exams, but do not clearly prove open-book, take-home, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or closed-book rules.

QuizzesTestsTwo Exams MentionedLecture-Based Test Prep

Assessment risk

Standard

54/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and exams, with one review saying test and quiz content comes from lectures.

QuizzesTestsTwo ExamsLecture-Based Test Prep
“4 quizzes 2 exams, 2 essays and a group project.”
HIST330
“Everything on the tests and .”
HIST330
“ and quizzes hard.”
HIST330

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

83/100

“She is really passionate about what she teaches and makes history interesting.”

📚 Workload Balance

52/100

“No busy work but you must show up to class for participation.”

⚖️

64/100

“Answers questions, and grades fair.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is just a good hearted and caring person.
  • The lectures are interesting and relevant to the material.
  • She is very clear on what she wants from her students and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Must must read book in order to pass but I mean its a history class what did you expect.
  • She expects you to absorb every bit of information from the textbook.
  • and quizzes hard.

Theme 3

🧑‍🤝‍🧑 About Participation

  • No busy work but you must show up to class for participation.
  • She has participations that you can't miss with no way to make up for it.
  • If you don't attend class you won't pass!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

73/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews provide useful and consistent in-person evidence, but online evidence is only one review and the total sample is modest.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HIST3307 reviews
HIST3402 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values